Center for International Private Enterprise · Non-profit · United States
Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.
The Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 1983, focused on promoting democracy and economic development through private sector engagement. The organization partners with local entities worldwide to craft business-driven solutions addressing socio-economic challenges. The website reflects a mature digital presence with a clear mission, professional design, and comprehensive content targeting business leaders, policymakers, and international development stakeholders. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, leveraging modern technologies such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with appropriate meta tags and structured data enhancing search visibility. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a good posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with the organization's mission and history. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but privacy protection is justified for this non-profit entity. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance trust and security maturity.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention cipe.org, from OffSeq Breach.
7 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cipe.org.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with cipe.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cipe.org.