Skip to main content

Security report for cilvektiesibugids.lv

Cilvēktiesību gids · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.cilvektiesibugids.lv is a Latvian human rights guide providing educational content on various human rights topics and everyday situations. It targets the general public interested in human rights education and operates as a non-profit entity. The platform offers thematic articles, rights information, court practice summaries, and interactive tests in Latvian, Russian, and English. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including self-hosted Matomo analytics for privacy-conscious tracking, Google Fonts, and cookie consent mechanisms. The design is professional, mobile-optimized, and accessible, with clear navigation and multilingual support. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves as a valuable educational resource in the human rights domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cilvektiesibugids.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cilvektiesibugids.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cilvektiesibugids.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche position in the Latvian non-profit educational sector focused on human rights. It leverages partnerships with European and governmental organizations, as evidenced by external links to Erasmus+, Baltic Human Rights, and government domains. The business model is informational and educational, likely funded by grants and donations. The absence of direct contact information on the analyzed page suggests a focus on content dissemination rather than direct commercial engagement. The multilingual approach broadens its reach within Latvia's diverse population. The site demonstrates consistent branding and quality content, supporting its credibility and potential for growth within its sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo) are used with default denial of ad and analytics storage until consent is given. A cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism is present, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could improve transparency and readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is acceptable for an informational non-profit site but could be improved with additional hardening and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Add clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cilvēktiesību gids
Description
A human rights guide providing information on human rights topics and everyday situations, with educational content in Latvian, Russian, and English.
Key services
Human rights thematic articles, Rights information, Court practice summaries, Tests and quizzes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics, Google Fonts (Manrope), CookieConsent library, SVG icons
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No ad personalization or analytics storage by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a multilingual human rights educational platform.
  2. Uses self-hosted Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics.
  3. Cookie consent banner with opt-in is implemented.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. External links mostly to partner organizations and EU programs.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and privacy-conscious technology stack including self-hosted Matomo analytics, Google Fonts, and cookie consent libraries. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with multilingual support and SVG iconography. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies on fonts.googleapis.com and partner domains. The HTML structure is valid and SEO basics are covered with meta tags and Open Graph data, though some meta descriptions are empty. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting appears stable with no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected. Technical risks are low but could be reduced by adding security headers and improving SEO metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cilvektiesibugids.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cilvektiesibugids.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.