Skip to main content

Security report for choice.com.au

CHOICE Australia · Non-profit · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CHOICE Australia is a well-established non-profit consumer advocacy organization founded in 1959, providing independent product reviews, consumer advice, and advocacy services to Australian consumers. The website demonstrates a strong market position with a large membership base and comprehensive content offerings. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript frameworks, analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and performance monitoring via New Relic, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking visible privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly, with room for enhanced transparency in privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching choice.com.au

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
79
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CHOICE operates as a non-profit entity focused on consumer advocacy and product testing, targeting Australian consumers who seek trustworthy information to make informed purchasing decisions. Its business model relies on membership subscriptions and advocacy campaigns. The organization maintains a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and active social media engagement. Partnerships with related domains such as action.choice.com.au and choice.community support its advocacy and community engagement efforts. The website's content quality and navigation support its mission effectively, positioning CHOICE as a leading authority in the Australian consumer space.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates security monitoring tools like New Relic, indicating proactive performance and security oversight. However, the absence of explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which could enhance trust and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CHOICE Australia
Description
CHOICE Australia is a not-for-profit consumer advocacy organization providing independent and unbiased reviews, product tests, articles, information and buying guides across various categories including appliances, electronics, technology, food and drink, babies and kids, health and body, outdoor and home improvement.
Key services
Independent product reviews, Consumer advocacy campaigns, Buying guides, Comparison tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Stripe.js, New Relic Browser monitoring
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic Browser, Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy links found in the provided HTML snippet
  3. Contact phone number found only in structured data, no email addresses publicly visible
  4. Strong use of analytics and marketing tools with extensive user tracking
  5. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  6. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no registrant details available
  7. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript technologies
  8. Good accessibility and SEO practices observed
  9. No suspicious or malicious domains linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Stripe.js, and New Relic for monitoring. The CMS is inferred to be Sitecore based on API endpoints. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses preconnect hints for resource optimization and lazy loading for images, enhancing load times. However, explicit framework details are limited. The technical implementation supports a professional user experience but could be further optimized with enhanced security headers and privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with choice.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review choice.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.