Skip to main content

Security report for cheynepier.com

Cheyne Pier · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cheyne Pier is a niche real estate business offering luxury residential moorings and houseboat living on Chelsea’s riverside in London. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of the unique lifestyle and services provided, targeting affluent individuals seeking exclusive riverside living. The technical infrastructure is based on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix Thunderbolt framework and modern JavaScript polyfills, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and some JavaScript hardening, but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and design suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is accessible and safe, but improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cheynepier.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cheyne Pier occupies a specialized market segment within the real estate sector, focusing on luxury moorings and houseboat residences along the River Thames. Its competitive advantage lies in offering well-located, serviced moorings with onsite experienced teams, appealing to a wealthy clientele. The business model centers on providing premium residential mooring services rather than traditional property sales. The website's structured data and professional presentation support credibility, though lack of detailed company registration or privacy policies limits full transparency. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company appears small in size, with a focused market presence in London.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. JavaScript bundles include security hardening scripts, indicating some attention to secure coding practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which may expose the business to regulatory risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Verify and publicly disclose domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide security contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cheyne Pier
Description
Cheyne Pier offers an incredibly rare opportunity to live on Chelsea’s riverside. Residents can enjoy the city life of one of London’s most exclusive addresses, alongside enviable views, outdoor decks, with the peace and tranquillity of living on the largest open space in London, the River Thames.
Key services
Houseboat moorings, Onsite experienced team support, Comprehensive range of mooring services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript polyfills (core-js, intl-segmenter), RequireJS, Wix Thunderbolt framework
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related JavaScript hardening (overrideGlobals bundle)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with professional design and structured data.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact forms detected; contact info limited to phone and address in structured data.
  5. No security or incident response policies visible.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected explicitly.
  7. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  8. Content is focused on luxury residential moorings on the River Thames in London.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Website is accessible without WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Wix Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern and modular JavaScript architecture. Polyfills for internationalization and legacy browser support are included, indicating attention to broad compatibility. The site uses RequireJS for module loading and hosts media and scripts on Wix's CDN infrastructure. Performance is moderate with optimized images and responsive design. However, SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no advanced schema beyond local business data. Accessibility is basic, with some focus management and skip links but no advanced ARIA roles detected. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cheynepier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cheynepier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.