Skip to main content

Security report for charitahk.cz

Oblastní charita Hradec Králové · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oblastní charita Hradec Králové is a regional non-profit organization providing a wide range of social and healthcare services including support for seniors, homeless people, victims of domestic violence, and families with disabled children. It operates as part of the larger Charita Česká republika network and maintains a strong presence in the Hradec Králové region. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its target audience. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and a cookie consent management platform, ensuring compliance with GDPR and user privacy standards. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap in domain trust assessment but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the organization's transparency and partner affiliations. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security policies, publishing incident response contacts, and improving domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching charitahk.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention charitahk.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for charitahk.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a solid market position as a key regional provider of charitable social and healthcare services. Its business model focuses on non-profit service delivery funded through donations, public grants, and partnerships. The website highlights multiple service offerings and ongoing projects, indicating active community engagement and growth. Partnerships with donation platforms and local initiatives strengthen its ecosystem. The clear presentation of contact information and partner acknowledgments supports credibility and trust. Growth indicators include active news updates and fundraising campaigns. The absence of a terms of service page and limited security policy disclosures are minor gaps in governance transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate potential compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The organization should consider formalizing and publishing security policies and incident response contacts to enhance trust and readiness. Regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries are recommended to maintain security hygiene.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and frameworks.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information for security issues.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is complete and publicly accessible.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Oblastní charita Hradec Králové
Registration number
45979855
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Oblastní charita Hradec Králové
Description
Pomáháme seniorům, nemocným, umírajícím, rodinám pečujícím o dítě s postižením, lidem bez domova, lidem ohroženým domácím násilím, lidem v nouzi nebo v krizi. Jsme součástí sítě charitních služeb, jejichž základním posláním je charita nebo-li "milosrdná láska".
Key services
Social services, Healthcare services, Homeless support, Domestic hospice care, Intervention center for domestic violence, Early care for children, Personal assistance, Social rehabilitation, Food and material aid
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Swiper.js (slider), CMP Vizus cookie consent, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Strong GDPR and cookie compliance with visible consent management.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and fonts.
  6. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (VIZUS) and employs contemporary web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Swiper.js for UI components. It uses web fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit, enhancing visual appeal. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility compliance and performance optimization to improve user experience further. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with charitahk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review charitahk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.