Skip to main content

Security report for cfl-mm.lu

CFL multimodal · Transportation · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CFL multimodal is a Luxembourg-based logistics and transportation company specializing in rail freight, multimodal hubs, and comprehensive logistics services. It operates as part of the CFL Group, providing sustainable and efficient freight solutions across Europe. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear service offerings and a focus on environmental responsibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Matomo. The security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment, but the overall business credibility is supported by consistent branding and social media presence. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie management.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cfl-mm.lu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strategic position in the European logistics market, leveraging Luxembourg's geographic advantage as a transport hub. Its business model centers on providing integrated rail and multimodal freight services, supported by infrastructure such as intermodal terminals and secured truck stops. The presence of subsidiaries and partnerships within the CFL Group enhances its market reach. The company targets business clients requiring efficient supply chain and freight solutions, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The website content and news updates indicate ongoing investments in green technologies and infrastructure expansion, signaling growth and market responsiveness.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent for privacy compliance. However, there is no visible evidence of advanced security headers or published security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of third-party analytics and scripts is standard but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is sufficient for a corporate informational site but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and explicit policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CFL multimodal
Description
CFL multimodal supports customers daily in choosing optimum logistic solutions to maximize growth with a focus on sustainable development. It offers rail freight, multimodal hub infrastructure, and logistics services.
Key services
Rail freight transport and maintenance, Multimodal hub services including intermodal terminals and secured truck stops
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, svg4everybody, FontAwesome 5.7.2, Bootstrap (implied by classes and navbar usage), Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia elements.
  2. Strong focus on multimodal logistics and rail freight services in Europe.
  3. Professional design and consistent branding throughout the site.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are clearly presented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Xing, and YouTube supports business credibility.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome, ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Matomo provides robust analytics capabilities. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and images efficiently, though performance is moderate and could be optimized further. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site structure and SEO elements are well implemented, supporting discoverability. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for improved security headers and potential technical debt from legacy libraries like jQuery 3.3.1.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cfl-mm.lu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cfl-mm.lu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.