Skip to main content

Security report for cewe.de

CEWE · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CEWE operates a large-scale e-commerce platform specializing in personalized photo products such as photobooks, calendars, greeting cards, and photo gifts. The website targets a broad consumer audience primarily in Germany and other German-speaking countries, offering a comprehensive range of photo printing services. The company is positioned as a leading European photo service provider with a strong brand presence and consistent digital branding across its platforms. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including ES modules, custom web components, and advanced tracking and consent management tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. The site demonstrates extensive user tracking for marketing and analytics purposes, balanced with a consent management platform to address privacy compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for user experience, though it could improve transparency around privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cewe.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
50
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CEWE's market positioning as a leading photo service provider is supported by a broad product portfolio and localized country-specific sites. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales of personalized photo products, leveraging digital printing technology. Revenue streams likely include product sales, gift vouchers, and software downloads. The target customer segments are general consumers interested in photo personalization and gifting. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including affiliate marketing (Awin) and advertising networks (Adform). Strategic observations include strong brand consistency, extensive use of tracking for marketing optimization, and a focus on mobile-friendly design. The lack of visible corporate registration or VAT information on the site suggests this information may be located elsewhere or restricted to corporate sites.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a consent management platform for GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, indicating limited transparency for security researchers. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risk, though mitigated by user consent. Incident response readiness and security policy documentation are not publicly visible, which could impact trust and compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an e-commerce site but could be enhanced by publishing security policies and hardening HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service with clear URLs accessible from all pages.
  2. Add standard security HTTP headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve page performance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more visible contact information including email and physical address to improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEWE
Description
Persönliche Fotoprodukte ganz einfach selbst gestalten. Vom persönlichen CEWE FOTOBUCH bis zum individuellen Fotogeschenk.
Key services
Fotobücher, Fotokalender, Grußkarten, Fotos, Poster & Wandbilder, Fotogeschenke
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Usercentrics CMP, Adobe DTM (Dynamic Tag Manager), Jentis tracking, SVG icons, WebP images, CSS variables, Custom web components (cwc-*)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Mouseflow, Adobe DTM
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Awin
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing Tracker, Pinterest Pixel, Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Google Adwords, Adobe DTM
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multiple product categories.
  2. Strong use of modern web technologies and consent management.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in provided content.
  4. Contact information limited to phone number in header; no email or physical address found.
  5. Extensive tracking and marketing scripts present, indicating active user behavior analytics.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with ES modules, custom web components, and CSS variables, indicating up-to-date development practices. It integrates multiple third-party services for tracking, marketing, and consent management, including Adobe DTM, Usercentrics, Jentis, and various ad networks. The site is optimized for mobile devices and uses responsive images with WebP format for performance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by optimizing third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, canonical links, and hreflang attributes for internationalization. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cewe.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cewe.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.