Skip to main content

Security report for cesarepozzoperte.it

Società nazionale di mutuo soccorso Cesare Pozzo ETS · Non-profit · Italy

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website secure.cesarepozzoperte.it serves as a secure login portal for the Società nazionale di mutuo soccorso Cesare Pozzo ETS, a non-profit mutual aid society based in Italy. The organization provides membership services to individuals and groups, particularly those under collective agreements. The site facilitates member access with a user code and password system, supported by clear instructions and assistance contact information. The business is positioned as an established mutual aid entity with a focus on social support and membership management. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Alpine.js for interactivity, SVG for branding graphics, and standard CSS and JavaScript assets. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and includes accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and structured content. SEO and metadata are basic but sufficient for the site's purpose. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating good security hygiene. However, security headers are not explicitly detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the mutual aid society, with a solid security posture and good privacy practices. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and adding terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cesarepozzoperte.it

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
73
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit mutual aid society serving members primarily in Italy. Its business model revolves around membership fees and providing social support services. The website targets individual members and collective agreement groups, offering secure access to member resources. The market position is stable within the non-profit sector, with a focus on social welfare. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit status. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with no explicit partner domains detected. Growth indicators are not visible on the site, but the presence of a detailed online handbook suggests ongoing member engagement and support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement, CSRF protection, and secure form handling. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a minor gap. No evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed credentials was found. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are lacking, which could be improved to enhance security readiness. Overall, the site balances usability and security effectively for its audience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish an incident response contact or security policy page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Consider integrating accessibility improvements to enhance usability for all users.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and security policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Società nazionale di mutuo soccorso Cesare Pozzo ETS
Description
A national mutual aid society providing membership services, likely in healthcare or social support sectors, with a focus on collective agreements and individual memberships.
Key services
Membership management, User login and access to member services, Support and assistance via email
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, SVG graphics, CSS vendor and app-shared stylesheets, JavaScript manifest, vendor, and app scripts
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in form
  • Password input uses autocomplete='current-password'
  • Form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a secure login portal for a mutual aid society
  2. Content is professional and consistent with business purpose
  3. Good use of HTTPS and CSRF protection
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. No social media links or phone numbers explicitly provided
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. Contact email provided for assistance
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond a single external script from elmobot.eu
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Alpine.js for reactive components and SVG for scalable graphics. Stylesheets and scripts are versioned and deferred for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive and includes a cookie consent banner for privacy compliance. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The technical implementation supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cesarepozzoperte.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cesarepozzoperte.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.