Skip to main content

Security report for cerebrum2007.cz

CEREBRUM 2007 · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CEREBRUM 2007 is a Czech non-profit patient organization dedicated to supporting individuals who have suffered brain injuries, including strokes, trauma, and tumors. The organization provides a community center, counseling services, educational workshops, and publishes informational materials to aid patients and their families. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals, and the general public interested in brain injury awareness. It maintains an active presence on multiple social media platforms and offers a newsletter for ongoing engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Google services such as Analytics and reCAPTCHA. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, some security headers are missing, and there is no explicit cookie consent banner, which could be improved for better GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and spam protection on forms. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, likely due to privacy protection, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for a small non-profit organization. Strategically, the organization should enhance its privacy compliance by implementing a cookie consent mechanism and consider publishing a security or incident response policy to further build trust. Regular updates and security header improvements will strengthen its security posture. The website effectively supports its mission and audience with clear navigation, relevant content, and community engagement tools.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cerebrum2007.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
90
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cerebrum2007.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cerebrum2007.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CEREBRUM 2007 operates as a specialized non-profit patient association in the Czech Republic, focusing on brain injury support. Its market positioning is niche but essential, serving patients, families, and healthcare professionals. The business model revolves around community support, education, and advocacy rather than commercial revenue. Revenue streams likely include donations (evidenced by the donation link), grants, and possibly government or EU funding. The organization maintains partnerships with donation platforms and engages in international cooperation. Growth indicators include active event calendars, workshops, and a multilingual website. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and donation services, enhancing outreach and funding. The organization's operations appear stable with a clear mission and consistent branding.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA protects forms against spam. However, the absence of several security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were found. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and consent checkbox on forms but lacks a cookie consent banner. Incident response readiness and security policy transparency are not evident. Overall, the security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish an incident response and security policy page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training for site administrators to foster a stronger security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CEREBRUM 2007, z.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEREBRUM 2007
Description
CEREBRUM 2007 is a patient non-profit organization associating citizens who have suffered brain damage (stroke, trauma, brain tumors, or other damage), their family members, and others. It provides comprehensive information about brain injury, operates a community center as a safe space for mutual motivation and support, and offers counseling and educational activities.
Key services
Community center activities, Counseling and advisory services, Educational workshops and events, Information dissemination, Publishing brochures and newsletters
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Popup Maker, Responsive Lightbox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, jQuery, Underscore.js
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on contact form
  • Consent checkbox for privacy policy on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
SmartEmailing (newsletter service)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, indicating privacy protection.
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, forms, and popups.
  4. Includes GDPR-compliant privacy policy and consent checkbox on contact form.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner found, which could be improved.
  6. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no explicit phone number or email in visible text.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  9. Security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional HTTP headers and cookie consent.
  10. No evidence of incident response or security policy pages.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with a suite of popular plugins including Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for form management, Popup Maker for modals, and Responsive Lightbox for image galleries. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and analytics. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly, with lazy loading for images to improve performance. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from further optimization. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, canonical URLs, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small non-profit organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cerebrum2007.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cerebrum2007.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.