Skip to main content

Security report for cepp.cz

Centrum psychologické pomoci, příspěvková organizace · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centrum psychologické pomoci (CEPP) is a Czech non-profit organization providing psychological and social support services, including foster care assistance and counseling. The organization is regionally funded and collaborates with various social and educational partners, positioning itself as a trusted regional social service provider. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress, with modern plugins supporting galleries, testimonials, and GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were found. Overall, the site is professional, compliant, and trustworthy, serving a general audience seeking social and psychological assistance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cepp.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cepp.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cepp.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CEPP operates in the non-profit social services sector, focusing on psychological help and foster care in the Moravian-Silesian region. Its business model relies on government funding and grants, supported by partnerships with regional authorities and foundations. The organization targets families, children, and social workers, offering counseling, educational events, and campaigns. The website's content and partner references indicate a stable market position with strong local credibility. The presence of testimonials and funding logos enhances trust. No commercial or revenue-generating activities are evident, consistent with its non-profit nature.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. The WordPress environment uses common plugins, which should be regularly updated to mitigate vulnerabilities. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the HTML, suggesting room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could benefit from additional hardening and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to reduce risk of exploitation.
  4. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Centrum psychologické pomoci, příspěvková organizace
Registration number
00 847 267
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centrum psychologické pomoci, příspěvková organizace
Description
Centrum psychologické pomoci is a non-profit organization providing psychological and social counseling, support for foster care, and related social services primarily in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. It is funded by regional government and state programs and collaborates with various social and educational partners.
Key services
Psychological counseling, Social counseling, Foster care support and preparation, Educational events and campaigns, E-learning
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, NextGEN Gallery plugin, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin, Strong Testimonials plugin
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Complianz GDPR cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit organization site.
  2. Compliant with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  4. Content is rich, relevant, and well structured.
  5. No critical security issues detected in the HTML content.
  6. Multiple external trusted partners and funding sources referenced.
  7. No phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contact found in HTML.
  8. Contact primarily via email form and physical address.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and jQuery, with plugins for galleries (NextGEN Gallery), contact forms (Contact Form 7), GDPR compliance (Complianz), and testimonials (Strong Testimonials). The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses standard CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO basics are covered with meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses a cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a regional non-profit organization website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cepp.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cepp.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.