Skip to main content

Security report for cenueksperts.lv

Akciju sabiedrība "Business Media" · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cenueksperts.lv is a Latvian price comparison website operated by Akciju sabiedrība "Business Media". The platform offers users the ability to compare prices across a wide range of product categories from various partner sellers, aiming to help consumers make smarter purchasing decisions. The website targets online shoppers in Latvia and positions itself as a trusted local price comparison service. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and custom JavaScript, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. The site is secured with HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library, which could pose security risks. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented. Contact information is limited to an email address with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in security best practices and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cenueksperts.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
60
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, specifically in e-commerce price comparison. It collaborates with multiple partners to aggregate product offers, providing a comprehensive catalog across categories such as electronics, household goods, fashion, and automotive products. The business model relies on affiliate or partner relationships to generate revenue. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand presence and quality content. The lack of phone or physical address may limit direct customer engagement. The company maintains a clear privacy and terms framework, supporting trust. No certifications or advanced security policies are published, indicating a focus on core business operations rather than extensive compliance or security marketing.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms but lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.12.0) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy pages are found, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is present. Tracking is done via a custom pixel and internal analytics, with no third-party trackers detected. The privacy policy and cookie consent align with GDPR requirements, but the absence of a dedicated security contact or DPO information limits transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance contact information by adding phone numbers or physical addresses to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Akciju sabiedrība "Business Media"
Description
Cenueksperts.lv palīdz lietotājiem orientēties tiešsaistes iepirkšanās pasaulē, piedāvājot cenu salīdzināšanas sistēmu, kas ļauj salīdzināt cenas no labākajiem pārdevējiem un iepirkties par zemākajām cenām.
Key services
cenu salīdzināšana, produktu kategoriju katalogs, partneru piedāvājumu apkopojums
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.0, custom JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • secure form with POST method
  • cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
custom analytics (window.__ga function)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian price comparison platform with clear navigation and multiple product categories.
  2. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  3. Contact email is provided but no phone or physical address found.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Uses HTTPS with no visible security headers; could improve security posture.
  6. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  7. Uses older jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  8. Tracking pixel and custom analytics present but no third-party analytics detected.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript technologies, including jQuery 1.12.0. It uses custom scripts for analytics and UI interactions. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for breadcrumbs (though empty). Hosting details are not explicitly found. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or legacy platform. Technical risks include outdated libraries and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce exposure to attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cenueksperts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cenueksperts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.