Skip to main content

Security report for centrum-poradenstvi.cz

Centrum poradenství pro rodinné a partnerské vztahy, p. o. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Centrum poradenství pro rodinné a partnerské vztahy, p. o. is a Czech non-profit social service organization providing specialized counseling and support services related to family and partner relationships, domestic violence intervention, and substitute family care. Established in 2012 and recently merged into Poradenské a krizové centrum, p. o., it serves clients primarily in the Zlín region with a focus on vulnerable populations. The website reflects this mission with clear service descriptions and contact information, though it lacks formal privacy and security policies. Technically, the site uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and the Nette framework, hosted by Wedos, and integrates Facebook social media. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, but accessibility and security headers could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but missing explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with a strong regional presence and transparent business information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centrum-poradenstvi.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a regional non-profit funded by the Zlínský kraj (regional government), focusing on social and psychological counseling services. Its business model is service-oriented with no commercial sales, targeting individuals and families in crisis or needing social support. The recent merger with Dětské centrum Zlín indicates strategic consolidation to enhance service delivery. Partnerships with related social service organizations and government registries enhance credibility and outreach. The website serves as an informational portal rather than a transactional platform, with no forms for direct client data collection. Growth indicators include expanded service offerings and digital presence through the merged entity's website. The organization maintains a moderate digital maturity with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent is present, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No forms or sensitive data collection points reduce attack surface, but the use of third-party libraries (e.g., jQuery) requires ongoing vulnerability management. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were detected. The organization should enhance security posture by publishing clear security policies, implementing recommended HTTP headers, and providing incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security HTTP headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy with dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Centrum poradenství pro rodinné a partnerské vztahy, p. o.
Registration number
70850992
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centrum poradenství pro rodinné a partnerské vztahy, p. o.
Description
Centrum poradenství pro rodinné a partnerské vztahy je zařízením sociálních služeb poskytující odborné sociální poradenství a služby sociální prevence. Organizace je příspěvkovou organizací zřizovanou Zlínským krajem a nabízí služby v oblasti rodinných a partnerských vztahů, domácího násilí, pěstounské péče, mediace a dalších sociálně-právních služeb.
Key services
Poradenské centrum (counseling center), Intervenční centrum (intervention center for domestic violence victims), Centrum náhradní rodinné péče (center for substitute family care)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, jQuery UI, Nette Framework AJAX, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website clearly states organizational merger and redirects users to new entity
  2. Comprehensive contact information provided including phone, email, physical address
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks
  6. No forms detected on homepage for data collection
  7. Facebook social media integration present
  8. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and the Nette PHP framework, indicating a mature but somewhat traditional technology stack. Hosting is provided by Wedos, a reputable Czech hosting provider. The site loads moderately fast with responsive design and mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, there is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. The site uses Facebook SDK for social integration but lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centrum-poradenstvi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centrum-poradenstvi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.