Skip to main content

Security report for centraltirgus.lv

centraltirgus.lv · Retail · Latvia

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rīgas Centrāltirgus is a prominent retail marketplace in Latvia, recognized as the largest shopping venue in the country and one of the largest markets in Europe. The website showcases the market's offerings including fresh products, local delicacies, and vendor information, targeting local shoppers and tourists. The business model revolves around providing a physical marketplace with vendor and catering services, supported by an informative and visually appealing website. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various plugins for enhanced user experience and SEO. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices implemented. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS and uses a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with room for improvement in security policies and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching centraltirgus.lv

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business holds a strong market position as a leading retail marketplace in Latvia, serving a broad audience including local consumers and tourists. Its competitive advantage lies in its size, unique atmosphere, and variety of fresh and local products. The website supports the business by providing vendor listings, working hours, and location information. Revenue streams likely include vendor fees and market services. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing customer engagement. The digital presence reflects a mature business with consistent branding and good content quality, though explicit corporate information and contact details are limited on the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and a detailed cookie consent mechanism that complies with GDPR principles. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure program indicates areas for improvement in security governance and transparency. Regular audits of third-party scripts and enhanced security headers are recommended to strengthen the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  3. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer if applicable.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
centraltirgus.lv
Description
Rīgas Centrāltirgus is the largest shopping place in Latvia and one of the biggest markets in Europe, offering fresh products, local delicacies, and a unique atmosphere.
Key services
Market pavilion shopping, Food catering, Vendor services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Fancybox, Slick Slider, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Rank Math SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and user control.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is confirmed.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with no visible security warnings.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Fancybox, and Slick Slider for enhanced UI/UX. SEO is managed via the Rank Math plugin, and analytics are collected through Google Analytics. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, providing granular user control over cookie categories. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good performance indicators. However, hosting provider details are not evident, and no advanced caching or CDN usage was detected in the HTML. The technical infrastructure supports a stable and user-friendly experience but could benefit from improved security configurations and clearer business contact information.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with centraltirgus.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review centraltirgus.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.