Skip to main content

Security report for celuprojekts.lv

Ceļuprojekts · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ceļuprojekts is a Latvian company specializing in road and bridge design, construction supervision, geotechnical surveys, and related engineering services. Established in 1958, it has a strong market presence and offers a comprehensive range of services including project management, expertise, and printing/archiving. The website reflects a mature business with detailed service descriptions and management contacts, targeting clients in the transportation infrastructure sector in Latvia. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern theme and multilingual support, showing good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching celuprojekts.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, providing essential infrastructure engineering services. Its long history and experienced staff position it as a reliable service provider in Latvia. The business model focuses on project lifecycle management from design to supervision. Revenue likely derives from government and private contracts. The website's multilingual feature indicates an intent to serve both local and international clients. Absence of social media and limited marketing tools suggest a traditional business approach. The company maintains detailed contact info and showcases its history and management team, enhancing credibility.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Establish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Ceļuprojekts
VAT number
LV40003026637
Registration number
40003026637
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ceļuprojekts
Description
Ceļu un tiltu projektēšana, ekspertīze, autoruzraudzība un būvuzraudzība. Ģeotehniskā izpēte, ģeotehniskās laboratorijas pakalpojumi.
Key services
Būvprojektu vadība (Construction project management), Projektēšana (Design), Ģeotehniskā un ģeoloģiskā izpēte (Geotechnical and geological surveys), Būvuzraudzība (Construction supervision), Būvprojektu ekspertīze (Project expertise), Druka un arhīvs (Printing and archiving)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.7.1, Kadence Theme, Kadence Blocks, jQuery 3.5.1, TranslatePress Multilingual
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is detailed and includes multiple phone numbers and emails.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Kadence theme and TranslatePress plugin for multilingual support.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.7.1 using the Kadence theme and Kadence Blocks plugin, indicating a modern and flexible CMS setup. It uses jQuery 3.5.1 and the TranslatePress plugin for multilingual support (Latvian and English). The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and WordPress.org domains. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, suggesting a focus on content and service presentation rather than aggressive digital marketing. Technical debt appears low but updating WordPress to a newer version is advisable.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with celuprojekts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review celuprojekts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.