Skip to main content

Security report for cedrops.cz

CEDR – Centrum duševní rovnováhy o.p.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CEDR – Centrum duševní rovnováhy o.p.s. is a Czech non-profit organization providing social services focused on individuals with mental illness and acquired brain injuries. Established since 1994, it offers comprehensive rehabilitation and employment support through protected workshops. The organization maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information, social media engagement, and regular news updates, positioning itself as a trusted regional service provider. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, optimized for mobile and SEO, though performance is moderate. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks visible security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cedrops.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CEDR operates in the non-profit social services sector, targeting individuals affected by mental health issues and brain injuries, as well as caretakers and job seekers in protected environments. Its business model revolves around providing rehabilitative and employment services, supported by donations and possibly public funding. The organization leverages digital tools such as newsletters and social media to engage its community. Its market position is stable with a long history and regional recognition. The website reflects a consistent brand and professional content, supporting credibility and outreach. No direct commercial partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, uses reputable plugins, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publish any security or incident response policies. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Forms are implemented via Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no advanced security measures are visible. Tracking via Google Analytics and Smartlook is present, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be improved with formal policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear information about data retention and user privacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CEDR – Centrum duševní rovnováhy o.p.s.
VAT number
CZ27547850
Registration number
27547850
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CEDR – Centrum duševní rovnováhy o.p.s.
Description
Sociální služby pro osoby se zkušeností s duševním onemocněním. Komplexní rehabilitace pro osoby se získaným poškozením mozku.
Key services
Social services for persons with mental illness, Comprehensive rehabilitation for acquired brain injury, Employment support in protected workshops
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.14, jQuery 3.5.1, Bootstrap 3.4.1, Yoast SEO plugin, MailPoet newsletter plugin, Contact Form 7, Popup Anything on Click, Justified Gallery, Smartlook analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by Contact Form 7 and popup plugins)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Smartlook
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Smartlook
Marketing tools
MailPoet newsletter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit social service provider site
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting local audience
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No security incident or vulnerability disclosure information present
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube
  9. Newsletter subscription implemented via MailPoet
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.14, using jQuery 3.5.1 and Bootstrap 3.4.1 for responsive design. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, and user engagement is supported by MailPoet for newsletters and Contact Form 7 for forms. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs and includes tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Smartlook. Performance is moderate, with some custom CSS and JavaScript for UI enhancements. Hosting is via Czech providers consistent with the domain registrar REG-INTERNET-CZ and Forpsi name servers. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. There is room for modernization by updating WordPress and Bootstrap versions and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cedrops.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cedrops.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.