Skip to main content

Security report for cbf.lv

"CBF & LANDSCAPE", SIA · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CBF & LANDSCAPE, SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in construction, landscaping, road building, and equipment rental services. The company targets both private and business clients within Latvia, offering a comprehensive range of services including territory improvement, infrastructure projects, and technical equipment leasing. Their website presents a professional image with clear navigation, project portfolios, and multiple contact channels, supporting their market position as a reliable local service provider. Technically, the website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and cloud CDN hosting to deliver moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or incident response policies. Analytics usage is moderate, employing Google Analytics and Snowplow for user tracking. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-appropriate, though improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cbf.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and real estate sectors with additional services in landscaping and construction. Their business model focuses on service delivery and equipment rental, catering to local infrastructure and private property projects. The website content and portfolio indicate a stable presence in the Latvian market, with a focus on quality and client-specific solutions. Partnerships include the website developer WebDigital.lv. The company maintains active social media profiles on major platforms, enhancing their outreach. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the detailed project gallery suggests ongoing operations. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and contact forms include Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy policies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the source. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"CBF & LANDSCAPE", SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
"CBF & LANDSCAPE", SIA
Description
Company provides high quality services in construction, landscaping, road building and repair, territory improvement, and technical equipment rental. They offer individual client approach and optimal solutions.
Key services
Road construction and repair, Territory landscaping and improvement, Technical equipment rental, Material production and delivery, Small architectural form manufacturing, Children's playground construction and maintenance, Engineering network construction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Skrollr.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Cloudfront CDN, Mapbox API
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA in contact form
  • No inline sensitive credentials

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banner detected
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  5. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools
  6. No visible security headers in HTML source
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube
  9. Professional design with responsive layout
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.0, Skrollr.js for parallax effects, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Snowplow for analytics. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN ensuring reliable content delivery. The site is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, which provides responsive design and modular content management. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced features detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph tags but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The site uses HTTPS exclusively, ensuring encrypted communication. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cbf.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cbf.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.