Skip to main content

Security report for castlehaven.org.uk

Castlehaven Community Association · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Castlehaven Community Association is a well-established non-profit organization based in Camden Town, UK, dedicated to providing safe, inclusive spaces and a variety of community programs for all ages and abilities. Their offerings include activities for seniors, youth programs, health and wellbeing initiatives, environmental projects, and emergency food support. The organization maintains a strong local presence and is recognized through awards such as the NCVO Trusted Charity Status and the Green Care Quality Mark. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, demonstrating a good level of digital maturity and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its community effectively, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming restrictions, which does not appear to impact legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching castlehaven.org.uk

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention castlehaven.org.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for castlehaven.org.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Castlehaven operates in the non-profit sector focusing on community development and social support within Camden Town. Their business model revolves around community engagement, volunteerism, fundraising, and space hire. The organization targets a diverse audience including children, young people, seniors, and marginalized groups such as LGBTQIA+. Their market position is strong locally, supported by partnerships and a visible social media presence. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and hire fees. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with clear strategic focus and community impact.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose. Use of CSRF tokens indicates attention to web security best practices. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers suggests areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The organization should consider formalizing and publishing security and incident response information to improve transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Add incident response contact details such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses for reporting issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Registration number
2069107Terms
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Castlehaven Community Association
Description
Award-winning Community Association in the heart of Camden Town providing safe, inclusive spaces and engaging activities for all ages & abilities. Responds to local community’s social, health, recreational and educational needs.
Key services
Event and work space hire, Volunteer and fundraising opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Analytics, jQuery, MonsterInsights, CookieYes (cookie consent), Lottie animations, Flickity carousel
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization and rejection options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on community engagement and social programs
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to domain naming rules error
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  8. Contact info includes email and phone with clear context
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder, integrating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Lottie for animations. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking via MonsterInsights plugin. CookieYes manages cookie consent with granular user controls. The site loads multiple optimized CSS and JS files, indicating performance optimization efforts. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented, including an accessibility toolbar. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a good user experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and formal documentation of security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with castlehaven.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review castlehaven.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.