Skip to main content

Security report for carolina.cz

Cebia, spol. s r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Carolina.cz is a Czech Republic-based mobile application focused on vehicle management, offering services such as vehicle history verification, cost tracking, valuation, insurance, and financing. The app is co-owned by Cebia, spol. s r.o., a company specializing in automotive data services, and ESSOX s.r.o., a financial services provider. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation and comprehensive content tailored to motorists in the Czech market. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and integrates app download links for multiple platforms including Android, iOS, and Huawei AppGallery. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts domain trustworthiness, though business legitimacy is supported by visible partnerships and contact information. Overall, the site demonstrates a solid digital presence with room for security and compliance enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching carolina.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation and finance sectors, targeting vehicle owners seeking comprehensive automotive management solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in combining vehicle data verification with financial services like insurance and loans, facilitated by partnerships with established companies Cebia and ESSOX. The business model revolves around a freemium or service-based mobile app offering alerts, valuations, and document management. Revenue streams likely include insurance referrals, financing commissions, and premium app features. The partnership ecosystem strengthens market position and trust. Growth indicators include multi-platform app availability and integration of financial products. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security posture and domain legitimacy to reinforce customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, indicating GDPR compliance awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The contact form uses client-side validation and AJAX submission but lacks visible advanced security controls. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is supported by privacy policy and consent banners. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cebia, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cebia, spol. s r.o.
Description
Mobilní aplikace Carolina se postará o vaše auto, prověří jeho historii, eviduje náklady a spotřebu, a uloží důležité dokumenty. Ocení automobil při nákupu nebo prodeji a nabídne výhodné pojištění i financování. Chrání vás před pokutami, poradí a pomůže na cestách.
Key services
Vehicle history verification, Cost and consumption tracking, Vehicle valuation, Insurance offers, Financing offers, Alerts and reminders
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS, Huawei AppGallery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about the Carolina mobile app.
  2. Strong partnership with ESSOX s.r.o. and Cebia, spol. s r.o. indicated.
  3. Comprehensive contact information and legal documents are provided.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; potential area for improvement.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  7. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components, Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with clear navigation and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting provider details are not available. The site integrates app store links and QR codes for easy mobile app access. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with carolina.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review carolina.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.