Skip to main content

Security report for capline.org

Transportation · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website capline.org is a French digital platform dedicated to the registration of nautical races. It centralizes race registrations and allows participants to upload and reuse necessary documents for their participation. The platform targets participants and organizers of nautical races, positioning itself as a niche service within the transportation sector. The domain was registered in April 2023, consistent with the business's recent establishment. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and Bootstrap for responsive design. It is hosted by Gandi SAS and served over HTTPS, ensuring basic security. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved to enhance security posture. The website is moderately optimized for mobile devices and performance is average. From a security perspective, the site has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and no DNSSEC. There are no privacy or cookie policies present, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and user trust. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is functional and serves its business purpose but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency to increase trustworthiness and regulatory compliance. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and providing clear contact and incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capline.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Capline.org operates as a specialized platform for nautical race registrations in France, targeting a niche market of race participants and organizers. The business model revolves around digital event registration and document management, simplifying participation processes. The company is small and newly founded in 2023, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its focus on nautical events, offering centralized registration and document reuse. Revenue streams likely include registration fees or service subscriptions. The absence of social media and limited contact information suggests early-stage digital marketing efforts. Partnerships or ecosystem relationships are not evident from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection status set. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense against common web threats. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also points to compliance gaps with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, which is positive. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small platform but requires enhancements to meet higher security and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response communication channel.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Plateforme digitale dédiée aux inscriptions de courses nautiques, centralisant les courses nautiques et simplifiant les inscriptions en ligne pour les participants.
Key services
Centralized registration for nautical races, Document upload and reuse for race participation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in French and targets French-speaking users interested in nautical race registrations.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Terms of service are present and accessible.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No forms detected on the homepage; login link present but no form HTML provided.
  7. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond translation and runtime scripts.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Branding is moderate with consistent logo usage in header.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with CSS styling and Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It loads multiple deferred JavaScript bundles and translation scripts, indicating internationalization support. Hosting is provided by Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features, which could be improved. No CMS or analytics platforms were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capline.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capline.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.