Skip to main content

Security report for capitalhome.lv

capitalHOME · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

capitalHOME is a Latvian company specializing in the wholesale and retail trade of a wide range of construction materials, serving individual builders, construction workers, and companies across Latvia. The company offers comprehensive building supply solutions including materials from foundations to roofs, heating equipment, windows, doors, fences, and gates. Their market position is that of a local, established supplier with multiple related websites and a broad product portfolio. Technically, the website uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics, with a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but lacking visible security headers and no explicit security or incident response policies found. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capitalhome.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates primarily in the construction materials retail and wholesale sector within Latvia, targeting both B2B and B2C customers. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a comprehensive range of well-known construction brands and delivery services nationwide. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with related websites such as clogi.lv and keramiskiedumvadi.lv, enhancing their market reach. Revenue streams likely include direct sales and delivery services. The website content and contact information support a credible business presence, although lack of WHOIS data limits external verification. Growth indicators include multiple product categories and active social media presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and a cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy awareness. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. No forms collecting sensitive data were found, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but would benefit from enhanced security headers, documented policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and expanding GDPR-related disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
capitalHOME
Description
capitalHOME is a Latvian company specializing in the wholesale and retail trade of all types of construction materials, offering comprehensive solutions from foundations to roofs. They provide well-known construction brands and deliver materials across Latvia. The company also offers building supplier services and aims to provide competitive pricing based on customer project calculations.
Key services
Wholesale and retail of construction materials, Building supplier services, Delivery of construction materials across Latvia, Sales of windows, doors, fences, gates, heating equipment, and related products
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.5.1, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Google Analytics (gtag.js), CSS animations
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No privacy or security policy pages explicitly found except basic privacy policy.
  5. No terms of service page detected.
  6. Contact information is clear and consistent with business operations.
  7. No forms with personal data collection detected on main page.
  8. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack including jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics. The site is mobile optimized with CSS animations and a responsive layout. Performance is moderate, with no explicit CMS detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site uses external resources from Google and social media platforms. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or advanced CMS platforms. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adopting modern frameworks and enhancing SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capitalhome.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capitalhome.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.