Skip to main content

Security report for capital-handling.com

Capital Handling · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Capital Handling is a Riga-based executive Fixed Base Operator (FBO) providing a comprehensive range of business aviation ground handling services including lounges, crew facilities, fuel supply, aircraft maintenance, and third-party arrangements such as limousines and hotel bookings. Established in 2012, the company positions itself as a premium service provider at Riga Airport, targeting discerning business aviation clients and crews. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its niche audience. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Analytics, with a custom or unknown CMS. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting and domain registration are transparent and consistent with the business claims, though DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are missing, representing areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and has domain transfer protections in place. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of cookie consent mechanisms, and missing security headers indicate compliance and security posture gaps. No forms or data collection points were detected, reducing immediate data exposure risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices and compliance documentation. The overall risk is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and DNS security would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence. The business credibility is high given the domain age, clear contact information, and professional presentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching capital-handling.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Capital Handling operates in the transportation sector specializing in business aviation ground handling services. Its market positioning as a Riga-based executive FBO leverages comprehensive service offerings including operations, passenger and crew facilities, fuel supply, aircraft maintenance, and conference facilities. The business model focuses on providing premium services to business aviation clients, including third-party arrangements for limousines and hotels, indicating diversified revenue streams. The company targets a niche segment of high-end aviation clientele and crews, supported by membership in industry associations such as EBAA. The website and branding reflect a consistent and professional image, supporting trust and market presence. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and strategic location at Riga Airport. Partnerships with aviation associations and local suppliers enhance operational capabilities and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections active. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), and absence of privacy and cookie policies highlight compliance and security gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing immediate exposure risks. Analytics usage via Google Analytics and Tag Manager is present but lacks visible privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements in policy publication, header implementation, and DNS security to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies on the website to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to inform users and obtain consent for tracking.
  4. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Capital Handling
Description
Capital Handling is a Riga-based executive Fixed Base Operator (FBO) complex providing high-level services including lounges, crew facilities, third party services like limousines, catering, hotel accommodation, laundry, fuel supply, ramp parking, hangarage, maintenance, and cleaning in a heated hangar.
Key services
Operations, Passenger facilities, Crew facilities, Dispatch Services, Fuel, Hotel Booking, Conference facilities, Aircraft Maintenance, Heated Hangar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.2, jQuery 2.1.4, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Modernizr, Snap.svg
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in footer with phone numbers, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected on the main page; no data collection forms present.
  5. Use of modern frontend libraries but no detected CMS.
  6. Security headers not detected in provided data; SSL is enabled and domain status clientTransferProhibited.
  7. No social media links found in HTML content.
  8. Website targets business aviation clients in Latvia.
  9. Good branding consistency and professional design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 4 alpha, jQuery 2.1.4, Modernizr, and Snap.svg for UI and interactivity. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site is custom-built without a detectable CMS, hosted under a registrar known for domain registration services. Performance is moderate with responsive design for mobile devices. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No forms or dynamic user input fields were detected, reducing complexity and security risks. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be enhanced for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with capital-handling.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review capital-handling.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.