Skip to main content

Security report for campuscomforts.com

Campus Comforts · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Campus Comforts is an e-commerce retailer specializing in providing move-in ready products and comforts tailored for university students. The website leverages WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, integrating third-party tools such as Zoho SalesIQ for live chat and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The business appears to be niche-focused with a clear target audience of university students and their families, offering services like free shipping and easy returns. The domain is mature, registered since 1998, and protected with registrar locks, indicating a stable business presence. Technically, the website uses a modern CMS and e-commerce platform with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. The site implements HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit privacy and security policies. Analytics and advertising tools such as Google Analytics and DoubleClick are used, with moderate user tracking levels. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good, but there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain locking, but the absence of DNSSEC, security.txt, and incident response contacts are gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. Privacy compliance is partial due to missing privacy policy and terms of service pages. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing accessibility features to improve compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching campuscomforts.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
35
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Campus Comforts operates in the retail and e-commerce sector, focusing on university students' needs for move-in products. The business model is direct-to-consumer online retail with value propositions including free shipping and easy returns. The company targets a niche market segment, which may provide competitive advantages through specialization. The website's mature domain age and consistent branding support credibility. Partnerships with service providers like Zoho and CookieYes indicate a reliance on established SaaS tools. The lack of visible contact information and formal policies suggests opportunities to strengthen customer trust and regulatory compliance. Growth potential exists by expanding transparency and enhancing user engagement features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registrar locks preventing unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categorization, supporting GDPR compliance to some extent. Analytics and advertising scripts are present, indicating moderate user tracking. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the scanned content. To improve security posture, the organization should enable DNSSEC, publish security and incident response policies, and consider a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Campus Comforts
Description
Online retailer specializing in providing move-in ready products and comforts for university students, including free shipping and easy returns.
Key services
Free shipping, Move-in ready products, Easy returns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, CommerceKit, Zoho SalesIQ, CookieYes
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple client status flags
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, JetPack, Sourcebuster
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
JetPack, Sourcebuster
Marketing tools
Zoho SalesIQ
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site targeting university students.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categorization.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content.
  5. Uses multiple third-party services including Zoho SalesIQ for live chat and CookieYes for consent management.
  6. SSL is enabled and domain is protected with registrar locks but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It uses CommerceKit for enhanced commerce features and integrates Zoho SalesIQ for live chat support. CookieYes manages cookie consent with a detailed consent banner and cookie categorization. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure based on DNS servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and RSS feeds. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The site uses modern web fonts and scripts, with no visible deprecated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can benefit from security enhancements and improved privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with campuscomforts.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review campuscomforts.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.