Skip to main content

Security report for camper.com

Camper · Retail · Finland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Camper is a well-established footwear brand operating a professional e-commerce platform targeting the Finnish market. The website offers a wide range of shoes and accessories for women, men, kids, and first walkers, including customization options and sustainability initiatives. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a rich user experience with clear navigation and branding consistency. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as React and Next.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and employs Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious cookie settings, though explicit security headers and incident response information are not found. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but does not outweigh the strong brand presence and professional site implementation. Overall, Camper's website is a secure, privacy-aware, and user-friendly retail platform with room for improvement in transparency and contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching camper.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention camper.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,877
Employees
2
Customers
4,857
Third parties
18
Weak passwords
19%

Latest record dated 2025-08-11 · 10 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for camper.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –www.camper.com2025-08-11
  • –camper.com2025-07-22

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Camper operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors, focusing on footwear and accessories. The brand targets a broad consumer base including women, men, and children, with specialized lines and seasonal collections. The business model centers on direct online sales complemented by physical stores (Camper Stores). The site highlights sustainability and customization as competitive advantages. The presence of a partner domain, Camperlab, indicates brand extension and product diversification. The company appears to have a strong market position with professional digital infrastructure and marketing tools. Revenue streams likely include product sales, gift cards, and possibly collaborations. The lack of explicit company registration or contact details online suggests a focus on brand rather than corporate transparency in this region.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms that deny ad personalization by default, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The use of Google Tag Manager is managed with consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the site is secure for users but could enhance trust by publishing security and incident response information and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main site footer.
  2. Add explicit HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS data availability issues to improve domain registration transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Camper
Description
Buy new shoes, boots, sneakers and accessories from the collection. Contemporary designs, original spirit. Free shipping and 2 years warranty.
Key services
Online sales of shoes and accessories, Customization of shoes (Camper One), Sustainability initiatives, Gift cards, Take Back program for old shoes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, WebP and AVIF image formats
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with denied ad personalization by default
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a fully functional e-commerce platform for Camper footwear and accessories targeting Finland region.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented with clear navigation.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with denied ad personalization by default, indicating privacy awareness.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service URLs found in the provided content snippet.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or not found for the queried domain, which is unusual for a commercial site but may be due to querying 'www' subdomain or privacy protection.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. It uses advanced image formats like WebP and AVIF for optimized loading. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing, with Cookiebot managing user consent effectively. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Hosting provider details are not visible. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of CSS. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving WHOIS transparency would strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with camper.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review camper.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.