Skip to main content

Security report for cameatechnology.com

CAMEA · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CAMEA is a specialized technology company focused on intelligent transportation and industrial monitoring solutions, operating since 1995. Their offerings include Weigh-In-Motion systems, traffic counters, speed enforcement technologies, and web inspection systems. The company targets government agencies, transportation authorities, and industrial clients, positioning itself as a trusted provider with ISO 9001 certification and type-approved enforcement solutions. The website demonstrates a professional digital presence with good content quality, clear navigation, and GDPR-compliant contact mechanisms. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and Hotjar, alongside security measures like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting further investigation. Security posture is generally strong but could be improved by adding explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-structured but should address domain registration transparency to enhance credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cameatechnology.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
64
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CAMEA operates in the transportation technology sector, offering hardware and software solutions for traffic data collection and enforcement. Their business model is B2B, focusing on government and industrial clients. The company leverages certifications and type approvals to maintain competitive advantage. The website content and product portfolio indicate a mature company with a medium size and established market presence. Partnerships with technology providers like Sherwood Digital support their digital infrastructure. The company uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to engage and track users, indicating a data-driven approach. Growth potential exists in expanding enforcement and industrial monitoring markets. However, the lack of transparent domain registration data could impact trust with new clients and partners.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, demonstrating good baseline security practices. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance are implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers were detected, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits the ability for coordinated vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adding explicit security documentation and improving HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CAMEA
Description
CAMEA provides unique solutions for intelligent transportation and industry, specializing in traffic data collection, enforcement systems, and industrial monitoring technologies since 1995.
Key services
Weigh-In-Motion systems, Traffic counters and classifiers, Speed enforcement solutions, Web inspection systems, Smart camera systems, Dimension-In-Motion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Hotjar, jQuery, Nette AJAX
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords
Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on transportation technology and enforcement solutions
  3. Comprehensive contact form with GDPR compliance and reCAPTCHA
  4. No WHOIS data available, raising questions about domain registration status
  5. Use of multiple Google services for analytics and marketing
  6. Presence of ISO 9001 certification as trust indicator
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Tag Manager, Hotjar, and reCAPTCHA for analytics, marketing, and security. It is built with the Nette Framework and uses AJAX for dynamic content. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and loads scripts asynchronously to improve performance. SEO is basic but present with meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The technical implementation supports the business goals but should address security header implementation and domain registration transparency to reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cameatechnology.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cameatechnology.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.