Skip to main content

Security report for cambianica.com

AUTOTRASPORTI CAMBIANICA SRL · Transportation · Italy

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AUTOTRASPORTI CAMBIANICA SRL is an established transportation and logistics company based in Italy, with over 50 years of experience in national and international freight transport. The company targets businesses and individuals requiring reliable transport services primarily in the Bergamo and Brescia regions. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates SEO best practices via Yoast SEO, along with Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. While the website presents a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and user experience, there are notable gaps in privacy compliance and security posture, including the absence of privacy and cookie policies and missing security headers. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and moderately secure but requires improvements in compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cambianica.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, providing logistics and freight services with a long-standing market presence. Its business model focuses on service delivery in transport and logistics, targeting regional and international clients. The website's integration with social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn supports its marketing and customer engagement efforts. The lack of visible contact information on the main page may limit direct customer interaction online. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual for a company with such a history and should be investigated to ensure domain ownership and legitimacy. The company appears to maintain a moderate size and market position with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet industry best practices and regulatory compliance, especially GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Configure and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Improve contact information visibility on the website to facilitate customer and security communications.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AUTOTRASPORTI CAMBIANICA SRL
Description
AUTOTRASPORTI CAMBIANICA SRL è una società operante nel settore dei trasporti internazionali e della logistica da oltre 50 anni.
Key services
International transport, Logistics, National transport
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Content is in Italian with English alternate
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers in provided HTML
  5. Uses modern WordPress theme and SEO plugin
  6. Social media links present for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  9. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, which provides a flexible and visually appealing design. SEO is enhanced through the Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Fonts are used for typography. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms from spam. The site appears mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and user experience. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cambianica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cambianica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.