Skip to main content

Security report for bysimona.cz

By Simona · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

By Simona is an e-commerce retail website specializing in fashion apparel and beauty products, targeting primarily adult consumers interested in premium casual wear and organic skincare. The website demonstrates a moderate level of digital maturity with a hybrid technology stack including AngularJS, jQuery, and Bootstrap 4, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and LFeeder for analytics and tracking. The site is accessible over HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting some compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, along with missing WHOIS domain registration data, limits the overall trust and compliance posture. Security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement in security best practices. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bysimona.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector, focusing on niche fashion and beauty products under the By Simona brand. The direct-to-consumer e-commerce model leverages online sales channels to reach its target audience. The product catalog includes a variety of clothing items such as hoodies, joggers, leggings, and t-shirts, alongside organic beauty products like shea butter and shampoos. The website's market positioning appears to be that of a small, specialized brand catering to consumers seeking premium and organic products. The presence of a partner domain (gomerch.sk) suggests collaboration or shared infrastructure. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business verification. Growth potential exists through improved digital marketing and compliance enhancements.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and uses a cookie consent banner to inform users about tracking technologies. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The use of third-party scripts introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content analyzed. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the site's preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and regulatory compliance.
  3. Establish and display incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident management.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
By Simona
Description
E-commerce site selling fashion and beauty products under the brand By Simona, including clothing (hoodies, joggers, leggings, t-shirts) and beauty products (organic shea butter, shampoos, creams).
Key services
Online retail of fashion apparel, Online retail of beauty and skincare products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-app), jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome 5, Google Fonts (Open Sans, Montserrat), Choices.js, Slick Carousel, Simple Lightbox, Inputmask.js, Google Tag Manager, LFeeder tracking
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LFeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LFeeder
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a retail e-commerce platform for fashion and beauty products.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data; security posture could be improved.
  6. Multiple external scripts and fonts loaded from reputable sources.
  7. No contact phone numbers found; only one email visible in mobile nav as info@gomerch.sk which is a different domain.
  8. Site uses AngularJS and jQuery, indicating a hybrid tech stack with some legacy components.
  9. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of AngularJS and jQuery, indicating a hybrid approach with some legacy technology components. Styling is managed via Bootstrap 4 and custom CSS, with fonts loaded from Google Fonts. The site integrates multiple third-party scripts for analytics and tracking, including Google Tag Manager and LFeeder. Performance appears moderate, with lazy loading of images and responsive design elements. However, the absence of detected CMS or hosting provider information limits infrastructure insights. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags present but no structured data like JSON-LD found. Technical debt may exist due to AngularJS usage, which is an older framework. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve SEO, and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bysimona.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bysimona.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.