Skip to main content

Security report for buvescentrs.lv

Baltic Būves centrs SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltic Būves centrs SIA is a Latvian construction and renovation company specializing in residential and commercial projects, including repair, finishing, construction works, and custom furniture manufacturing. The company has a solid portfolio of projects primarily located in Riga and surrounding areas, targeting homeowners and businesses seeking quality construction services. The website presents a professional image with clear navigation, project showcases, and client references, supporting its market position as a reputable local service provider. Technically, the website uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.10.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API. While functional, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of modern security headers indicate areas for technical improvement. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, but lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No privacy policy or terms of service were found, which impacts privacy compliance. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance, updating technical components, and enhancing security configurations to strengthen trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching buvescentrs.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Baltic Būves centrs operates in the Latvian real estate and construction sector, focusing on renovation and construction services. Their business model is project-based service delivery with additional custom furniture manufacturing. The company targets homeowners and commercial clients in Riga and nearby regions. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise founded in 2007, with a consistent brand and a portfolio of completed projects. The presence of client logos and social media links suggests active client engagement and marketing efforts. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company appears well-positioned locally with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.1) may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts were found, indicating gaps in compliance and security governance. No visible vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any hidden vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Baltic Būves centrs SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltic Būves centrs SIA
Description
Baltic Būves centrs is a construction and renovation company offering services such as repair and finishing works, construction works, and custom furniture. They showcase various residential and commercial projects primarily in Riga and surrounding areas.
Key services
Remonta un apdares darbi (Repair and finishing works), Celtniecības darbi (Construction works), Mēbeles pēc pasūtījuma (Custom furniture)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed), Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika (commented out), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  5. Contact information clearly provided in footer with email, phone, and address.
  6. Use of outdated jQuery version (1.10.1) may pose security risks.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to construction and renovation services.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  10. Multiple project examples and client logos enhance trustworthiness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy jQuery version (1.10.1) alongside Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API for tracking and functionality. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously, which is good for performance. CSS and fonts are loaded from local and Google Fonts sources. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications, suggesting a custom or legacy-built platform. Performance is moderate with a loading spinner for images. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive elements but could be improved. SEO meta tags are minimal with empty description and keywords. Accessibility features are limited. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with buvescentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review buvescentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.