Skip to main content

Security report for burzafilantropie.cz

Koalice nevládek Pardubicka, z.s. (KONEP) · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Burza filantropie is a Czech non-profit platform that connects the non-profit, business, and public sectors to facilitate philanthropic donations and support for social projects. The website serves as a regional hub for philanthropic activities, showcasing current projects, past initiatives, and partner organizations. It targets donors, non-profit organizations, and public sector entities primarily within the Czech Republic. The platform is supported by regional government bodies and local non-profit coalitions, indicating a strong community and governmental partnership. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Analytics, reflecting a standard modern web infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and bot protection but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which slightly impacts trust but is common for non-profit entities. Overall, the website is legitimate, professional, and serves its philanthropic mission effectively, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of burzafilantropie.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burzafilantropie.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the non-profit and government sectors, focusing on philanthropy and social project funding. Its business model revolves around connecting donors with projects and organizing events and seminars to promote charitable giving. The presence of regional government partners and local non-profit coalitions strengthens its market position and credibility. Revenue streams likely include donations and possibly grants or sponsorships from partner organizations. The target customers are non-profit organizations seeking funding, donors interested in social causes, and public sector bodies supporting community development. Growth indicators include expanding regional coverage and increasing donation volumes. The partnership ecosystem is robust, featuring regional governments and corporate donors. Strategic observations suggest the platform is well-positioned regionally but could enhance digital maturity and compliance to scale further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), visible privacy and cookie policies, and formal incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing policies and DPO contacts. Incident response readiness appears minimal with no dedicated security contact channels. The security culture is implied but not explicitly communicated. Enhancing security headers, transparency, and compliance documentation would improve the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features and provide a data protection officer contact to strengthen compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Koalice nevládek Pardubicka, z.s. (KONEP)
Description
Burza filantropie is a platform connecting the non-profit, business, and public sectors in the Czech Republic to support philanthropic projects. It facilitates donations and project support across various Czech regions, promoting cooperation and funding for social initiatives.
Key services
Connecting donors with non-profit projects, Organizing philanthropic events and seminars, Providing information and support for project applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Fancybox
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting Czech non-profit and public sectors
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on homepage or linked pages
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contacts
  5. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates moderate tracking and bot protection
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and scripts
  8. Partner logos and regional government entities are prominently displayed
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  10. No data protection officer contact or security incident contacts found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using standard technologies including jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, and Google Analytics. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site uses modern meta tags and SEO practices but lacks advanced technical SEO features. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The absence of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance represent technical debt and modernization opportunities. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and compliance areas to reduce risks and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 46/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burzafilantropie.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burzafilantropie.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.