Is buryblindsociety.org Safe? Security Analysis for Bury Society for Blind and Partially Sighted People
https://www.buryblindsociety.org/Check if buryblindsociety.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
GDPR-aligned
Data handling
EU
Hosting region
EveryPay
Secure checkout
Instant
Reports delivered
Unlock the full report for buryblindsociety.org
Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
AI Summary
Bury Society for Blind and Partially Sighted People is a small, independent local charity focused on supporting blind and partially sighted individuals in Bury and surrounding areas. The organization offers a range of practical services including early intervention, rehabilitation, befriending, daily living skills, and social activities. It operates primarily through grants, donations, and local fundraising efforts, and is commissioned by Bury Metropolitan Borough Council to provide sensory services for the visually impaired. The website reflects a clear mission and provides useful resources and contact points for its audience. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Modernizr and Enquire.js, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and clear navigation. However, there is no visible cookie consent mechanism or comprehensive security headers, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. The absence of security headers and cookie policies slightly lowers the security posture. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for small charities but reduces transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates a good level of trustworthiness and professionalism appropriate for a non-profit organization. Strategically, the organization should focus on enhancing its security posture by implementing security headers, adding cookie consent mechanisms, and publishing security and incident response policies. Improving WHOIS transparency where possible would also enhance trust. These steps will help maintain compliance and protect the organization and its users better.
Detected Technologies
12 urgent findings need attention
1 critical · 11 high
- + 4 more findings in the full report below
Keep buryblindsociety.org under constant watch
Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.
Security drift alerts
Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps
Compliance watch
GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots
Infrastructure surface
Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes
Content & tracker intelligence
Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates
Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.
OffSeq Observations
No critical findings yet
77/100
SSL/TLS Security
5 findings
57/100
Network Security
3 findings
0/100
Email Security
5 findings
70/100
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The charity holds a strong local market position as the commissioned sensory service provider for visually impaired residents in Bury. Its business model relies on grants, donations, and fundraising, targeting visually impaired individuals and the local community. The website supports fundraising efforts through PayPal donations and Easyfundraising affiliate links. The organization maintains a clear brand identity and consistent messaging. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital engagement and volunteer recruitment. Partnerships appear limited to local government commissioning and fundraising platforms. The charity's operational focus is on direct community support rather than commercial expansion.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Company Registration
Bury Society for Blind and Partially Sighted People
4815165
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is partially demonstrated via a privacy policy document, but cookie consent is missing. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file indicates limited formal security communication channels. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Bury Society for Blind and Partially Sighted People
A small, independent local charity offering practical support and equipment to address challenges of sight loss, promoting well-being and independence of blind and partially sighted people in Bury and surrounding areas.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS implied by canonical and shortlink URLs using https
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Get this report delivered to your inbox
Receive a summary of the buryblindsociety.org security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
Controls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
Controls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
Detected sectors: transport, health, digital
Need this report as a PDF?
Download the complete buryblindsociety.org security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
DMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
DMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
BIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
SSL certificate expires in 64 days
HSTS Not Enabled
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
DNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
Domain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
How does buryblindsociety.org compare?
buryblindsociety.org scores below average. Browse similar domains to see how competitors handle security.
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings
Additional Findings
Download the buryblindsociety.org report as PDF
Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.
Optional add-ons
via BREACHYour order
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
Want OffSeq to fix this?
Book a 30-minute remediation call
Our security engineers can resolve the high-severity findings identified in this report — from SSL misconfigurations and missing headers to compliance gaps and infrastructure hardening.
OffSeq provides end-to-end cybersecurity services: penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, compliance consulting, and continuous monitoring. View all services
Scan your own website
Liked the buryblindsociety.org report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.
Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.
How did we do?
Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.
What others say about buryblindsociety.org
Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.
Community rating
—out of 5
0 reviews published