Skip to main content

Security report for burri.world

BURRI public elements AG · Transportation · Switzerland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BURRI public elements AG is a well-established Swiss company specializing in products and projects for public spaces, including outdoor furniture, lighting, and mobility infrastructure. The website reflects a mature digital presence with multilingual support and a focus on inclusion and sustainability. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies and integrates popular analytics and marketing tools, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved with additional security headers and clearer privacy compliance. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy, supporting the company's market position as a leader in public space elements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching burri.world

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets municipalities, urban planners, and public space managers, offering a broad range of products that enhance urban environments. Their business model includes manufacturing, design, and lifecycle care services. The website content and certifications indicate a strong reputation and commitment to quality. The presence of awards and a 20-year spare parts guarantee further reinforce their market credibility. The company operates primarily in Switzerland but also serves international clients. The lack of explicit contact details on the website may limit direct customer engagement online.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, reducing performance impact. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, which could improve incident response readiness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no clear cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure minimal privacy impact and compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BURRI public elements AG
Description
BURRI public elements AG is a competence center for public space with over 120 years of experience. They offer products and projects in outdoor furniture, mobile urban greenery, lighting, bus stop infrastructure, info and advertising technology, and traffic technology, serving society and contributing to vibrant public spaces in Switzerland and abroad.
Key services
Outdoor furniture, Mobile urban greenery, Lighting solutions, Bus stop infrastructure, Info and advertising technology, Traffic technology, Lifecycle care and spare parts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by classes like btn, dropdown)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages detected in the snippet.
  4. Use of multiple marketing and analytics scripts with consent mechanism not clearly visible.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Website is multilingual with German, French, and English versions.
  7. Strong branding and consistent design.
  8. Content focuses on public space elements and urban infrastructure.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including Craft CMS, Bootstrap, and various JavaScript analytics libraries. It is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML. Hosting details are not explicitly found. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics and marketing, which should be monitored for privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with burri.world. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review burri.world.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.