Skip to main content

Security report for bulletliner.lv

Bullet Liner · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bullet Liner is a Latvian-based company specializing in advanced two-component polyurethane spray coatings for vehicles, industrial, environmental, and military applications. The company positions itself as a market leader offering durable protective coatings with a lifetime warranty, leveraging ACCELLA polyurethane technology. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, featuring multilingual support and customer testimonials that enhance credibility. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, explicit privacy policies and contact information are not clearly presented, which could impact user trust and compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response details. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bulletliner.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets vehicle owners, industrial clients, and military sectors with specialized polyurethane coatings. Its business model revolves around service provision and product application, emphasizing long-term surface protection solutions. Partnerships, such as with SKANDI MOTORS, indicate a collaborative ecosystem enhancing market reach. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise focused on quality and customer satisfaction. Growth potential exists through expanded digital presence and improved compliance documentation. Revenue streams likely derive from coating services and related product sales. Strategic observations include the need for clearer contact channels and formalized security policies to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. Absence of security headers and lack of incident response contacts represent gaps that could expose the business to risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed via cookie management but lacks a formal privacy policy. The security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in transparency and proactive vulnerability disclosure. Enhancing security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and providing clear incident response contacts would elevate the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bullet Liner
Description
Bullet Liner offers a unique two-component polyurethane spray coating system from ACCELLA polyurethane systems. It provides long-lasting surface protection for various materials including metal, wood, and concrete. The coating is touch-dry within seconds and can be subjected to maximum load after 24 hours. Available in a wide range of colors using RAL, NCS, or original car body tones. It is positioned as the most effective long-term surface protection solution.
Key services
Protective coatings for vehicles, Protective coatings for environmental objects, Industrial protective coatings, Polyurethane applications for military purposes, Foam plastic products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Elementor 3.28.1, Yoast SEO 24.7, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English and Russian language alternatives.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR-focused.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Uses modern WordPress theme Astra and Elementor page builder.
  7. Includes customer testimonials and partner logos enhancing trust.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is multilingual with Latvian, English, and Russian versions. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the absence of advanced security headers and incomplete WHOIS data limit full technical trust assessment. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical stack is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bulletliner.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bulletliner.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.