Skip to main content

Security report for bullet-journal.eu

Bullet Journal by LEUCHTTURM1917 · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bullet Journal by LEUCHTTURM1917 operates a professional e-commerce platform focused on premium stationery products, primarily bullet journals and related writing instruments. The company leverages its long-standing brand heritage dating back to 1917 to position itself as a trusted provider within the European market. The website offers a curated shopping experience with clear navigation, product presentation, and customer support channels. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, integrates Google Analytics and other marketing tools, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving a general audience with safe content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bullet-journal.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a premium retailer in the stationery sector, targeting consumers interested in high-quality bullet journals and writing accessories. Its e-commerce model is supported by efficient shipping across the EU and dedicated customer service. The company maintains a consistent brand presence across multiple regional domains and social media platforms, enhancing market reach and customer engagement. The partnership with bulletjournal.com and the parent LEUCHTTURM1917 group strengthens its market credibility. Revenue streams are primarily product sales, supported by marketing and content resources such as blogs and newsletters. The company shows indicators of stable operations with a medium-sized footprint and a focus on quality and customer experience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS encryption, secure form handling, and a robust cookie consent framework that respects user privacy and GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business scale but could be enhanced by adopting additional security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bullet Journal by LEUCHTTURM1917
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bullet Journal by LEUCHTTURM1917
Description
Das im Jahr 1917 gegründete Traditionsunternehmen produziert edle Schreibwaren und hat eine innovative Produktpalette. Official webshop for premium products available across the EU with efficient shipping and customer support.
Key services
Online sales of notebooks, Writing instruments, Books, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Factfinder, Mouseflow, Various marketing and analytics scripts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off on search

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mouseflow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mouseflow
Marketing tools
Factfinder
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for LEUCHTTURM1917's Bullet Journal products.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls is implemented.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact forms.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. WHOIS data and website content are consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, along with marketing tools like Factfinder and Mouseflow. The site is mobile-optimized with appropriate meta tags and icons for various devices. Performance is moderate with video content and multiple scripts, but no significant delays or errors were observed. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, with no explicit identification. SEO is supported by canonical tags, hreflang links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing management to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bullet-journal.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bullet-journal.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.