Skip to main content

Security report for bulkestate.com

Bulkestate · Real Estate · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bulkestate operates as a real estate crowdfunding and group buying platform, enabling investors to participate in peer-to-peer property loans online. The platform targets investors interested in real estate investment opportunities through crowdfunding mechanisms. The website presents a professional design with clear business descriptions and a focus on real estate investment services. Technically, the site employs modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is HTTPS enabled with good SSL configuration, ensuring secure data transmission. However, the absence of WHOIS registrant data and domain registration details introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS but lacks security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bulkestate.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bulkestate.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
126
Employees
0
Customers
126
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bulkestate.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bulkestate positions itself in the niche real estate crowdfunding market, offering P2P property loan investment opportunities. Its business model revolves around aggregating investor funds for real estate projects, leveraging group buying power. The platform likely generates revenue through fees or interest on loans. The target audience includes retail and accredited investors seeking alternative real estate investments. The use of advanced tracking and analytics tools suggests a focus on growth and customer acquisition. However, the lack of visible contact information and regulatory disclosures may limit trust among cautious investors. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The platform's market position is specialized but credible based on website professionalism.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is present, which are important for handling security incidents. The use of third-party analytics introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are detected, the security maturity could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and establish a clear vulnerability disclosure program to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information including security and abuse contacts to build trust and facilitate communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bulkestate
Description
Bulkestate is a real estate crowdfunding and group buying platform. Invest in peer to peer (P2P) property loans online.
Key services
Real estate crowdfunding, Group buying, P2P property loans
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Onfido SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  9. Business appears focused on real estate crowdfunding and P2P investing.
  10. No explicit certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The presence of Onfido SDK suggests identity verification or KYC processes integrated. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could be improved with optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bulkestate.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bulkestate.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.