Skip to main content

Security report for bukoteks.lv

Bukoteks · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bukoteks is a Latvian general contractor company specializing in construction, reconstruction, repair, and installation services. Founded in 1998, it has established itself as a reputable medium-sized business with over 27 years of experience. The company targets businesses and organizations in Latvia requiring comprehensive building services, including project management and specialized installations such as electrical and HVAC systems. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frontend libraries such as Swiper.js and FancyBox, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. SEO practices are implemented via Yoast SEO, and lazy loading is used to enhance loading speed. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA integration, although HTTP security headers are not explicitly detected. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers and formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies. Privacy compliance is supported by the presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR awareness. Contact information and certifications such as ISO 9001, 14001, and 45001 enhance business credibility. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the business information and digital presence support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, formalizing security policies, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bukoteks.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bukoteks operates in the construction and real estate sector in Latvia, serving a B2B market with a full range of construction-related services. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence, ISO certifications, and a broad portfolio of completed projects. The company leverages partnerships and showcases client logos to build trust. Revenue streams likely come from general contracting, specialized installations, and project management. The website supports growth by highlighting recent projects and vacancies, indicating active business development. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized Latvian companies and industry certifications, reinforcing market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in formal policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “BUKOTEKS”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bukoteks
Description
SIA “BUKOTEKS” ir vispārējo celtniecības darbu ģenerāluzņēmēja kompānija.
Key services
Construction, Reconstruction, Repair, Installation, Project management, Electrical installations, HVAC installations, Water supply and sewage systems, Finishing works
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js, FancyBox, Google reCAPTCHA, Yall.js (lazy loading), AccelerateWP, Redis Object Cache
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with English alternate language available
  3. No forms with visible input fields detected on main page
  4. Contact info clearly displayed in footer
  5. Multiple client logos and certifications shown
  6. Use of modern frontend libraries and SEO optimization
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, FancyBox for image galleries, and Yall.js for lazy loading images. It uses AccelerateWP and Redis Object Cache for performance optimization and serves WebP images for faster loading. SEO is managed by Yoast SEO plugin. The site is mobile responsive with a hamburger menu for navigation on smaller screens. Google Fonts are used with preconnect and preload optimizations. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. No hosting provider information is directly available from the HTML. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and performant with good SEO and UX practices, though security headers are missing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bukoteks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bukoteks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.