Skip to main content

Security report for bukkehave.com

Bukkehave · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bukkehave.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 404 error page indicating the requested page could not be found. The WHOIS lookup failed to retrieve any registration data, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, expired, or inactive. The website's metadata indicates it is intended to represent Bukkehave, a company providing fleet solutions for emerging markets in Africa, but no substantive content or contact information is available to verify this. Technically, the site appears to be built with Next.js and React, but the lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or SSL information indicate a low level of digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS verification and lack of security best practices. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to its inaccessibility and lack of verifiable business or security information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bukkehave.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bukkehave appears to target fleet operators in emerging African markets, offering specialized logistics and fleet support services. However, the absence of accessible website content, contact details, or WHOIS registration data limits the ability to assess market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model robustness. No partnerships, certifications, or trust signals are evident. The business intelligence picture is incomplete and suggests either a nascent or inactive online presence.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor. The site lacks HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and any visible privacy or cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust assessment. These factors combined indicate a low security maturity level and potential compliance gaps with data protection regulations such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Register or renew the domain to ensure active ownership and legitimacy.
  2. Deploy HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and configure essential security headers.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  5. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security awareness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website returns a 404 error page with minimal content indicating the page could not be found. No WAF or security challenge detected but content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Company
Bukkehave
Description
Bukkehave has extensive experience working in emerging markets with harsh and hostile environments. We support our clients in everything from supplying just ...
Key services
Fleet solutions, Supply chain support
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, Next.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible, returning a 404 error page
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact information or forms detected
  4. No security headers or SSL information available
  5. No external links or social media profiles found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, domain likely unregistered or expired
  7. Technical stack indicates use of Next.js but site is non-functional
  8. Overall website quality and professionalism is poor
  9. No trust or compliance indicators present
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript frameworks including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary technology stack. However, the site is currently non-functional, returning a 404 error page with minimal content. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. Performance and SEO optimization appear lacking due to missing meta tags and content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic at best. Technical debt is evident in the incomplete deployment and lack of essential web standards compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bukkehave.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bukkehave.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.