Skip to main content

Security report for bukgeras.lt

Asociacija „Kraujas“ · Non-profit · Lithuania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bukgeras.lt represents the non-profit initiative "Būk geras" operated by Asociacija „Kraujas", focused on raising awareness about blood cancer and bone marrow donation in Lithuania. It serves as an informational and advocacy platform encouraging donor registration and financial support. The site is well-positioned within the Lithuanian health non-profit sector, targeting the general public and potential donors with educational content and personal stories. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using established libraries such as Bootstrap and Font Awesome, with integration of Google Analytics and Facebook SDK for tracking and social engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, though security headers and incident response policies are absent, indicating room for improvement. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, supporting its legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bukgeras.lt

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The initiative operates as a small-sized non-profit entity with a clear mission to educate and recruit bone marrow donors in Lithuania. It leverages storytelling and community engagement to build trust and encourage participation. The business model relies on informational outreach and voluntary financial contributions. The partnership with Morka Labs for website development indicates a professional approach to digital presence. The organization maintains active social media channels to extend its reach. The absence of commercial activities and certifications is consistent with its non-profit nature. Growth potential lies in expanding donor registration and public awareness campaigns.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent in place, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces its security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Facebook SDK and Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but is managed with user consent. To enhance security, the organization should implement additional HTTP security headers, publish a security policy, and establish clear incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Expand privacy disclosures to include detailed data retention policies and third-party data sharing practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociacija „Kraujas“
Description
Iniciatyva „Būk geras“ yra informacinė ir agitacinė kampanija, veikianti nuo 2005 metų, siekianti pristatyti visuomenei kraujo vėžio ir kaulų čiulpų donorystės problemas, suteikti informaciją apie donorystę ir paneigti mitus.
Key services
Informacijos teikimas apie kaulų čiulpų donorystę, Donorystės skatinimas, Savanorystės ir paramos organizavimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.2, Font Awesome 4.3.0, jQuery 2.1.3, Venobox, Animate.css, Google Fonts (Source Sans Pro), Facebook SDK, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook SDK
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on non-profit health awareness and donor recruitment.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and social media integration.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 3.3.2 and Font Awesome 4.3.0, which are somewhat dated but still functional. JavaScript libraries include jQuery 2.1.3 and Venobox for UI enhancements. Google Fonts and Facebook SDK are integrated for typography and social media features. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, the site could benefit from updating to newer versions of frameworks and optimizing scripts for faster load times. No critical technical debt or errors were observed in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bukgeras.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bukgeras.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.