Skip to main content

Security report for bruidsmodemariska.nl

Bruidsmode Mariska · Retail · Netherlands

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bruidsmode Mariska is a small local bridal fashion retailer based in the Netherlands, specializing in wedding dresses including plus-size and colored gowns. The website is built on WordPress with common plugins and libraries, indicating a standard digital infrastructure suitable for small retail businesses. The site is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges detected. However, it lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are important for compliance and trust. The security posture is basic with no advanced protections evident. Overall, the site presents a professional retail presence but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security measures to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bruidsmodemariska.nl

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets brides-to-be looking for specialized wedding dresses, including plus-size and colored options, positioning itself in a niche market segment within the bridal retail industry. The business model is retail-focused with a physical store presence in Krommenie, Netherlands. The website supports marketing efforts through Google Tag Manager and ConvertBox but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or customer testimonials. The absence of explicit contact details online may limit customer engagement and trust. The company appears to operate independently without parent or subsidiary affiliations.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, or incident response contacts. The use of HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed from the data. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from input vulnerabilities, but also limiting customer interaction capabilities. The site should implement standard security best practices, including security headers, privacy notices, and incident response mechanisms to enhance its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and make it easily accessible on the website.
  2. Add a cookie policy with a consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Configure and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer trust.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact channels to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bruidsmode Mariska
Description
Bruidsmode Mariska is a bridal fashion business specializing in wedding dresses, including plus-size and colored wedding gowns. The business operates a bridal store located in Krommenie, Netherlands.
Key services
Sale of wedding dresses, Plus-size bridal gowns, Colored bridal gowns, Bridal fashion retail
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, FontAwesome, ElegantIcons, Google Tag Manager, ConvertBox, ThePerfectWedding
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ConvertBox
Marketing tools
ConvertBox
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and common web fonts and icon libraries.
  5. External links include Google Tag Manager and marketing tools but no suspicious domains.
  6. No security headers or advanced security policies detected in the HTML content.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph meta tags detected in the provided content.
  8. No forms or input fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Content is focused on bridal fashion retail with emphasis on plus-size and colored wedding dresses.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Yoast SEO plugin, FontAwesome, and ElegantIcons for UI elements. It integrates Google Tag Manager and ConvertBox for marketing and analytics purposes. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with good design quality and navigation clarity. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The absence of structured data and Open Graph tags limits social media integration and SEO richness. Technical debt appears low but security and privacy implementations require enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bruidsmodemariska.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bruidsmodemariska.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.