Skip to main content

Security report for brugesana24.lv

SIA "LGBR" · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website brugesana24.lv represents a small Latvian company, SIA "LGBR", specializing in paving and related construction services. The business emphasizes quality workmanship led by a certified construction engineer with 15 years of experience. Their service offerings include paving, earthworks, driveway construction, engineering services, and snow removal, targeting both private and corporate clients in Latvia. The site is built on WordPress using the Breakdance builder and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented, reflecting GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly presented, including phone, email, and physical address, enhancing business credibility. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Security headers are not detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the site is professional, user-friendly, and trustworthy for its business scope.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brugesana24.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA "LGBR" operates in the real estate and construction sector, focusing on paving and landscaping services. Their market position is local with a strong emphasis on quality and certified expertise. The business model is service-oriented, catering to both individual homeowners and businesses requiring construction and maintenance of paved surfaces. The company leverages digital tools like WordPress and Google Tag Manager for online presence and analytics. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicates awareness of regulatory requirements. The company maintains a Facebook page for social engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The business appears stable with a clear value proposition centered on quality and reliability.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security.txt or incident response contact information is found, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. Forms collect personal data but lack visible advanced security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to standardize vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance form security by integrating CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques to prevent spam and abuse.
  5. Regularly monitor and update all plugins and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "LGBR"
VAT number
LV40103826908
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "LGBR"
Description
Uzticami bruģēšanas speciālisti, piedāvā bruģēšanu, zemes darbus, piemājas ceļa izbūvi, būvinženiera pakalpojumus un sniega tīrīšanu. Darbus vada sertificēts ceļu, ielu, laukumu būvinženieris ar 15 gadu pieredzi.
Key services
Bruģēšana, Zemes darbi, Piemājas ceļa izbūve, Būvinženiera pakalpojumi, Sniega tīrīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Breakdance plugin, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js, LightGallery, Complianz GDPR plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Breakdance builder and several plugins.
  2. Clear business focus on paving and construction services in Latvia.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed and includes phone, email, and physical address.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no DNSSEC info found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook page.
  10. Forms collect personal data including name, phone, email, location, and comments.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Breakdance page builder plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and LightGallery and Swiper.js for interactive galleries and sliders. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets asynchronously, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design breakpoints defined. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing asset delivery and caching strategies. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies are observed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brugesana24.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brugesana24.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.