Skip to main content

Security report for brt.it

BRT · Transportation · Italy

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BRT is a well-established Italian courier and logistics company operating under the parent company DPDgroup. The company offers a broad range of services including express courier, international shipping, logistics solutions, and specialized services such as temperature-controlled shipping (BRT fresh). The website targets both private individuals and business clients, providing comprehensive service information and customer support channels. The digital presence is professional, with a clear structure and multilingual support, primarily in Italian and English. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses various plugins for enhanced functionality including form management and cookie consent. The site employs HTTPS with strong security headers, indicating a mature security posture. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and TrustCommander, with appropriate cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security-wise, the site demonstrates good practices such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers but lacks publicly available dedicated security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the content or WHOIS data. The domain registration is consistent with the business identity, reinforcing trustworthiness. Overall, BRT's website reflects a mature logistics business with solid technical infrastructure and good security hygiene. Strategic improvements could include publishing explicit security policies and incident response contacts to enhance transparency and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brt.it

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
65
Email security
97
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention brt.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9,440
Employees
3
Customers
9,379
Third parties
58
Weak passwords
12%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for brt.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sts.brt.it2025-07-20
  • –sts.brt.it2025-07-20
  • –sts.brt.it2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BRT holds a strong market position in the Italian and European logistics sector as part of the DPDgroup. Its business model focuses on providing comprehensive courier and logistics services to both private and business customers, including e-commerce solutions. The company leverages a multi-channel approach with dedicated platforms for business, consumer, and logistics clients. The partnership with DPDgroup enhances its competitive advantage and market reach. The website's content and linked domains indicate a well-integrated ecosystem supporting various customer segments. Growth indicators include promotional campaigns and specialized services like BRT fresh. The company maintains a consistent brand image and provides extensive customer support, contributing to customer retention and trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers (HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.), and secure cookie consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response page suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. GDPR compliance is evident through comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data aligns with the business identity, reducing risks of domain spoofing or fraud. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and procedures for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BRT
Description
BRT is a courier and logistics company offering international shipping and logistics services primarily in Italy and Europe.
Key services
Express courier services, International shipping, Logistics solutions, E-commerce shipping, BRT fresh (temperature controlled shipping)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, TrustCommander (cookie consent), DPD CMS Modules, Form Maker plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies and consent mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustCommander
Marketing tools
TrustCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is primarily in Italian with English language options.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple contact channels including forms, emails, and phone numbers.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found publicly.
  9. Strong branding consistent with parent company DPDgroup.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using modern technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates multiple plugins for content management, form handling, and cookie consent. The presence of Google Tag Manager and TrustCommander indicates advanced marketing and compliance tooling. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The technical infrastructure appears well-maintained with no visible technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and further optimize performance metrics. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but the use of CDN and external services suggests a distributed hosting environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brt.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brt.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.