Skip to main content

Security report for brs-hamburg.de

Behinderten- und Rehabilitationssportverband Hamburg e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Behinderten- und Rehabilitationssportverband Hamburg e.V. (BRS Hamburg) is a regional non-profit sports association dedicated to promoting disabled and rehabilitation sports in Hamburg, Germany. The website serves as an information hub for athletes, clubs, medical professionals, and interested parties, offering news, sports offers, training, and educational resources. It maintains a clear market position as a specialized organization in the non-profit sports sector focused on accessibility and inclusion. The site provides comprehensive contact options and maintains active communication channels including newsletters and social media.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brs-hamburg.de

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention brs-hamburg.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for brs-hamburg.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BRS Hamburg operates within the non-profit sports sector, targeting disabled and rehabilitation sports communities. Its business model revolves around providing information, training, and support rather than commercial sales. The organization leverages partnerships with local sports bodies and sponsors, as evidenced by displayed logos. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on community engagement and education, with growth potential in digital outreach through newsletters and events. The association's credibility is supported by consistent branding, clear contact information, and GDPR-compliant data collection.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. Forms include CSRF tokens, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, there is no explicit security policy or incident response information published, which could be improved. Security headers are not explicitly detected in the provided data, suggesting room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious scripts were identified. Overall, the site follows good security practices appropriate for a non-profit organization but could benefit from formalizing security policies and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data protection.
  2. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Behinderten- und Rehabilitationssportverband Hamburg e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Behinderten- und Rehabilitationssportverband Hamburg e.V.
Description
Behinderten- und Rehabilitatins-Sportverband Hamburg e.V. - BRS Hamburg. Hier finden Sie alle relevanten Infos zum Thema Behindertensport, Rehabilitationssport
Key services
Information on rehabilitation sports, Sports offers for disabled persons, Training and education for sports instructors, News and events related to disabled sports, Newsletter subscription
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiesck (cookie consent), ReadSpeaker (text-to-speech)
Frameworks
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiesck cookie consent, AcyMailing newsletter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on disabled and rehabilitation sports in Hamburg.
  3. Uses Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Good use of analytics and marketing tools with user consent.
  10. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with modern frontend technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and uses Cookiesck for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features such as ReadSpeaker for text-to-speech. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The technical stack is appropriate for the organization's needs, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site benefits from structured navigation and SEO-friendly meta tags, contributing to good user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brs-hamburg.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brs-hamburg.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.