Skip to main content

Security report for brothershop.lv

Sonika SIA · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Broterhshop, operated by Sonika SIA, is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in label and laser printers, sewing machines, and overlockers. The website targets both business and individual customers seeking specialized printing and sewing equipment. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with a professional website built on WordPress and WooCommerce, integrating modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Mailchimp. The site is well-structured with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but could be improved by adding security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the business appears legitimate and focused on a niche retail market in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brothershop.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector, focusing on specialized equipment for printing and sewing. Its business model is e-commerce based, leveraging WooCommerce for online sales. The presence of social media links and marketing tools indicates active customer engagement and digital marketing efforts. However, the absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies may limit trust for some customers. The company appears small-sized with a localized market focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The use of structured data and SEO plugins suggests an intent to maintain good search visibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses a cookie consent banner compliant with GDPR principles. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt file is present. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which should be regularly audited for security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company email and phone numbers to enhance trust.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Sonika SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Sonika SIA
Description
Uzlīmju un lāzeru printeri, šujmašīnas un overloki
Key services
Sales of label printers, Sales of laser printers, Sales of sewing machines, Sales of overlockers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Mailchimp
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Google Ads, Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling label and laser printers, sewing machines, and overlockers.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML content.
  4. No explicit contact information (email, phone, physical address) found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook and Instagram links.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, Mailchimp for marketing and analytics.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses popular libraries and frameworks such as jQuery and Bootstrap, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads a variety of scripts asynchronously to optimize performance, though overall loading speed is moderate. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brothershop.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brothershop.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.