Skip to main content

Security report for brnonakole.cz

Brno na kole · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brno na kole is a well-established non-profit organization dedicated to promoting cycling and improving cycling infrastructure in Brno, Czech Republic. The website serves as a hub for cycling maps, news, analyses, and community events, targeting local cyclists and urban mobility advocates. The organization has a clear market position as a local advocacy group with a strong community presence and active social media engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme and WPBakery Page Builder, integrating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and OpenLayers for map functionalities. Hosting is provided by Websupport, a reputable provider. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features and solid SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with anonymized IP tracking in Google Analytics, but lacks important security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy with consistent registration details and a domain age appropriate for the organization's history. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening to improve user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brnonakole.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brno na kole operates as a small non-profit focused on transportation advocacy, specifically cycling infrastructure in Brno. Its competitive advantage lies in its local expertise, community engagement, and comprehensive cycling resources including maps and event organization. Revenue streams likely include donations and grants typical for non-profits. The target customers are local cyclists, urban planners, and residents interested in sustainable transport. The organization maintains partnerships with local cycling initiatives such as Bike Kitchen Brno. Growth indicators include regular content updates and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to expand digital engagement and improve compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which limits incident response readiness. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. The site uses standard WordPress security practices but could improve by auditing plugins and implementing stronger security controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Brno na kole, zapsaný spolek
Registration number
265 716 25
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brno na kole
Description
Brno na kole is a registered non-profit association focused on promoting cycling and improving cycling infrastructure in Brno, Czech Republic. They provide cycling maps, news, analyses, and organize events to encourage cycling as a mode of transport.
Key services
Cycling maps, News and analyses on cycling and urban mobility, Organizing cycling events, Advocacy for better cycling infrastructure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, OpenLayers, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder, Salient Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled with anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls (implied by WordPress standard)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit advocacy site focused on cycling in Brno.
  2. Content is in Czech language and well-structured with regular updates.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Contact information is available but no phone numbers found.
  5. Social media presence is strong with links to Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Google Analytics and Jetpack used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform with the Salient theme and WPBakery Page Builder, leveraging JavaScript libraries like jQuery and OpenLayers for interactive maps. Hosting is stable with Websupport name servers. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers. Technical debt appears manageable but should be addressed to improve security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brnonakole.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brnonakole.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.