Skip to main content

Security report for brnoadvokati.cz

JUDr. František Štourač advokátní kancelář · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a professional law firm based in Brno, Czech Republic, specializing in a broad range of legal services including criminal, family, commercial, and administrative law. The firm emphasizes personalized, reliable, and discreet legal support with a team of qualified lawyers and support staff. The business is well-established with nearly two decades of experience and a solid client base. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google services, hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. Security measures include HTTPS, reCAPTCHA on forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, although explicit security headers and dedicated security policies are absent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, making it suitable for its target audience of individuals and businesses seeking legal counsel in the Czech Republic.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brnoadvokati.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The law firm operates in the legal services sector with a focus on multiple practice areas, targeting both individuals and corporate clients. Its market position is strengthened by a well-presented team with detailed credentials and a physical office in a prestigious location (AZ Tower). The business model is service-oriented, relying on client trust and professional expertise. The firm leverages partnerships with various legal and financial experts to provide comprehensive solutions. The website content and structure support client acquisition and engagement, with clear contact channels and multilingual service offerings. Growth indicators include a sizable active client base and a broad service portfolio. The firm maintains an active social media presence, enhancing its outreach and brand visibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The absence of a dedicated security policy page and vulnerability disclosure mechanism limits user trust in security practices. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve in advanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a dedicated terms of service page to clarify legal usage and liabilities.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
  5. Consider appointing and publishing Data Protection Officer contact details to enhance GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
JUDr. František Štourač advokátní kancelář
VAT number
CZ8207153856
Registration number
73735701
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
JUDr. František Štourač advokátní kancelář
Description
Advokátní kancelář Brno Štourač poskytuje komplexní právní služby ve všech oblastech práva, zejména v trestním, rodinném, obchodním a správním právu. Kancelář nabízí profesionální a individuální přístup, zastupování před soudy a správními orgány, a spolupracuje s odborníky v ČR i zahraničí. Sídlí v AZ Tower v Brně a poskytuje služby i v angličtině, němčině a italštině.
Key services
Trestní právo, Rodinné právo, Obchodní právo, Správní právo, Právo nemovitostí, Vymáhání pohledávek, Řešení sporů, Pracovní právo, Insolvence, Právo veřejných zakázek
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Animate.css, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance
  3. Clear contact information and team presentation
  4. No visible security or privacy policy pages
  5. Use of modern web technologies and Google services
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or unknown CMS using a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates Google services such as reCAPTCHA and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses a cookie consent framework from firmsys.cz, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by adding security headers and improving accessibility standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brnoadvokati.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brnoadvokati.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.