Skip to main content

Security report for brinumins.lv

Talsu Ģimeņu un bērnu attīstības centrs «Brīnumiņš» · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Talsu Ģimeņu un bērnu attīstības centrs «Brīnumiņš» is a Latvian non-profit organization focused on supporting families and children's development in the Talsi region. The website presents a clear overview of their services including medical institution support, day care, family support centers, and various therapeutic and educational activities. The organization maintains a local/regional presence with partnerships and sponsorships from multiple recognized entities. Technically, the website uses modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and animation libraries, providing a good user experience with responsive design and clear navigation. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is implied but security headers are missing, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which affects GDPR compliance. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brinumins.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small-sized non-profit entity serving families and children with developmental and support services. Its market position is local and community-focused, leveraging partnerships with governmental and private sponsors. The business model is service-oriented, relying on donations and sponsorships as indicated by the 'Ziedo' (Donate) page and sponsor logos. The target audience includes families in need of support and therapeutic services. The website content and external links reflect a stable partnership ecosystem, enhancing credibility and community integration. Growth indicators include active news updates and community stories. The lack of commercial advertising and tracking suggests a focus on service rather than revenue generation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No forms collecting sensitive data were found, reducing immediate risk of data leakage. Privacy policy is present but lacks cookie consent mechanisms, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited formal security governance. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be improved with standard security headers, cookie consent, and documented incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user engagement while maintaining compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Talsu Ģimeņu un bērnu attīstības centrs «Brīnumiņš»
Description
Talsu Ģimeņu un bērnu attīstības centrs «Brīnumiņš» is a family and child development center providing support services to children and families in the Talsi region of Latvia.
Key services
Medical institution services, Day care center, Family support center
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href https://
  • No forms detected collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses modern front-end libraries and frameworks.
  4. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  5. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Multiple external partner and sponsor domains linked.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL usage implied but not confirmed.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  10. Content is family-oriented, safe, and non-commercial.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Owl Carousel for sliders, and AOS for animations. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets locally, indicating self-hosting or dedicated hosting. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization indicators such as lazy loading or minimized assets detected in the provided HTML. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks explicitly visible. SEO is basic with meta description and Open Graph tags present but no structured data (JSON-LD) found. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site build. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brinumins.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brinumins.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.