Skip to main content

Security report for bridges2000.es

BRIDGES2000.NL · Transportation · Netherlands

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bridges2000 is a specialized company providing custom-made bridge and gangway solutions primarily for maritime, offshore, civil engineering, and event sectors. With over 25 years of experience and thousands of satisfied clients, the company positions itself as a reliable and fast provider of secure connections. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Avada theme, supporting multiple languages, and integrates modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced, but lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and branding indicate a legitimate business. Contact information is limited to a phone number with no public email or physical address visible. Overall, the site is well-structured and targets business clients needing secure bridge solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bridges2000.es

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
45
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bridges2000 operates in the transportation and manufacturing sectors, focusing on bridge and gangway solutions. Their business model includes custom manufacturing, rental services, and consulting. The company targets B2B clients in maritime, offshore, civil engineering, and event industries. The multilingual website supports international reach, primarily in Spanish, Dutch, and English. The company emphasizes speed, safety, and precision, offering rapid quotations and certified products. The presence of testimonials and warranty claims enhances trust. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site is a minor gap. The company appears medium-sized with a solid market position in its niche.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site uses third-party analytics scripts which should be regularly audited for security. There is no visible privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are absent, limiting transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement cookie consent banners to obtain user consent for tracking.
  3. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company email and physical address.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and update CMS/plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

VAT number
NL817387274
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BRIDGES2000.NL
Description
Bridges2000 provides custom-made, fast, and secure bridge and gangway solutions for civil, maritime, offshore, and event sectors. They emphasize safety, speed, and precision in their products and services.
Key services
Custom bridge manufacturing, Bridge rental, Gangways, Fenders, Pontons, Mobicats, Special solutions, Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Fusion Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Clarity for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query restrictions by Red.es.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly displayed but no email contact found in HTML.
  5. Multiple language versions exist (Spanish, Dutch, English) indicating international presence.
  6. Use of modern analytics and SEO tools.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder framework, indicating a mature and flexible CMS environment. It supports multiple languages via WPML, enhancing international usability. The site integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bridges2000.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bridges2000.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.