Skip to main content

Security report for brasfieldgorrie.com

Brasfield & Gorrie · Real Estate · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Brasfield & Gorrie is a leading general contractor prominently positioned as the #1 ENR Texas & Southeast General Contractor. The company specializes in construction services including design-build, self-perform construction, safety, preconstruction, and innovation. Their website reflects a professional and well-branded presence targeting construction industry clients and partners primarily in the United States. The digital infrastructure is built on WordPress with multilingual support via Weglot, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Hotjar. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks some security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, indicating room for compliance improvement. The domain WHOIS data is missing, which raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and branding suggest a legitimate enterprise. Overall, the site is well-designed, SEO optimized, and user-friendly, but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching brasfieldgorrie.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
15
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Brasfield & Gorrie operates in the real estate and construction sectors with a focus on the Texas and Southeast US markets. Their business model centers on providing comprehensive general contracting services with a strong emphasis on innovation and self-performance. The company leverages a professional online presence to attract clients and talent, including a dedicated careers subdomain. Their market position as a top-ranked contractor by ENR indicates strong competitive advantage and industry recognition. The use of advanced analytics and marketing tools suggests a mature digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of visible privacy and security policies may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients. The absence of WHOIS data is unusual for a company of this scale and should be investigated to ensure domain ownership legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used, which increases the attack surface but are loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no evidence of a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which limits transparency and incident response readiness. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may lead to compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, formalizing incident response contacts, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain ownership legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks and optimize performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Brasfield & Gorrie
Description
Our locally led construction teams are true builders, committed to serving our partners, communities, and the future we’re building toward.
Key services
Design-build, Self-perform construction, Safety management, Preconstruction services, Innovation in construction
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Weglot translation plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Maps API, YouTube iframe API, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found in HTML content
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. Multiple external tracking and analytics scripts are used
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered publicly
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with Weglot for multilingual support
  8. Strong SEO and structured data implementation observed
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Weglot for multilingual support, Google Tag Manager for analytics management, and integration of Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Hotjar for user behavior tracking. The site uses responsive design techniques and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. SEO is enhanced through Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) implementation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to reduce blocking. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected in the provided HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with brasfieldgorrie.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review brasfieldgorrie.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.