Skip to main content

Security report for bptre.com

Newsec · Real Estate · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Newsec is a well-established real estate services company operating in the Baltic region, offering consulting, property management, and investment services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with a focus on real estate clients and investors. The business model centers on providing comprehensive real estate solutions, positioning Newsec as a key player in the Baltic real estate market since 2004. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as WPBakery, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The hosting infrastructure leverages Amazon AWS DNS services, indicating a reliable hosting environment. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in implementing additional security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is well addressed through Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR adherence and transparent cookie disclosures. Overall, the website is accessible, well-structured, and professionally maintained, supporting Newsec's business credibility and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bptre.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bptre.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bptre.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Newsec's market positioning as a Baltic real estate services provider is supported by a mature domain age and consistent WHOIS data. The company leverages digital tools for marketing and analytics, including Google and Meta advertising platforms, and MailerLite for marketing automation. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for contact via forms, which may impact direct customer engagement. The website's SEO and mobile optimization indicate a focus on user experience and discoverability. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found, suggesting Newsec operates independently or under a different corporate structure not disclosed on the site. The company demonstrates a commitment to privacy and compliance, which is critical in the real estate sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cookiebot for cookie consent, reflecting good privacy and security practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts and plugins is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to demonstrate security maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding direct contact information such as verified company emails and phone numbers to facilitate customer communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Newsec
Description
Nekilnojamas turtas, konsultacijos, valdymas, investavimas - NEWSEC
Key services
Real estate consulting, Property management, Investment services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4.12, PHP, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, MailerLite, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses a professional WordPress CMS with modern plugins
  2. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot with detailed cookie disclosures
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found on the site itself, but privacy policy linked via Cookiebot
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in HTML
  5. No visible terms of service or incident response information
  6. Website is well optimized for SEO and mobile devices
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using WPBakery Page Builder, with integration of modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking, alongside MailerLite for marketing automation. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, but reliance on multiple third-party scripts necessitates vigilant security updates and monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bptre.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bptre.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.