Skip to main content

Security report for boxstyle.eu

Boxstyle · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Boxstyle is a small business specializing in the production of innovative modular houses using frame technology designed for all-season living. Their offerings emphasize modern design, spacious and naturally lit rooms, and detailed interior design. The company provides a comprehensive package including exterior and interior decoration, equipped bathrooms, and electrical installations. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Gutenberg blocks and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. While the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information, it lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but could improve by adding security headers and incident response contacts. Overall, the website presents a professional image with moderate trustworthiness but should address privacy compliance gaps to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boxstyle.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention boxstyle.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for boxstyle.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Boxstyle operates in the real estate sector focusing on modular housing solutions. Their market positioning targets customers seeking modern, energy-efficient, and well-designed modular homes. The business model revolves around manufacturing and selling these homes with a focus on quality materials and warranty offerings. The website supports multiple languages, indicating an intent to reach a broader European audience. Contact details are prominently displayed, facilitating customer engagement. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests a need for improved regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The company leverages modern web technologies to maintain a competitive digital presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security, which could harden the site against common web attacks. No incident response or abuse contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. The use of third-party analytics scripts introduces potential privacy concerns, especially without a cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. To improve security maturity, the site should implement comprehensive security headers, publish a privacy policy, and establish clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add an incident response or abuse contact email to facilitate security issue reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Boxstyle
Description
Producer of innovative modular houses using frame technology for all-season living, offering modern design, spacious rooms with natural light, and detailed interior design. The price includes exterior and interior decoration, equipped bathroom, and electrical installation.
Key services
Modular house production, Interior and exterior decoration, Equipped bathrooms, Electrical installation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Stackable Ultimate Gutenberg Blocks, Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, Getwid Blocks, Modula Gallery
Frameworks
Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site with modern design and multiple language support.
  2. Contact information is clearly presented in header areas.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Use of reputable analytics and tracking tools but no visible consent mechanism.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  6. No visible social media links detected in provided content.
  7. Site uses HTTPS and loads external resources from trusted domains.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 using a combination of premium Gutenberg blocks plugins such as Stackable Ultimate and Ultimate Addons for Gutenberg, along with Getwid and Modula for galleries. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and uses Google Fonts. Performance appears moderate based on the number of loaded CSS and JS assets. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and skip links present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Hosting provider details are not directly discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boxstyle.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boxstyle.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.