Skip to main content

Security report for bournebeauty.com

Bourne Beauty · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bourne Beauty is a small retail business specializing in plant-based skincare products, targeting consumers seeking natural beauty solutions. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform, featuring clear branding and structured data to enhance search visibility. The technical infrastructure leverages Wix's hosting and content management system, with integration of Facebook Pixel for marketing analytics and Sentry for error monitoring. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, impacting trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a functional e-commerce presence with room for improvement in privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bournebeauty.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bourne Beauty operates in the niche plant-based skincare market, leveraging e-commerce to reach customers interested in natural and clear skin solutions. The business model focuses on direct online sales, supported by digital marketing tools such as Facebook Pixel. The company provides clear contact information including a UK physical address and phone number, enhancing credibility. However, the lack of visible privacy policies and terms of service may hinder compliance and customer trust. The website's use of structured data indicates an understanding of SEO best practices. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. Growth potential exists with improvements in compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses third-party scripts including Facebook Pixel and Sentry, which require careful management to avoid privacy issues. No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism was found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear terms of service and incident response contact information to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bourne Beauty
Description
Bourne Beauty offers plant-based skincare products aimed at promoting clear skin and high confidence. The business targets customers interested in natural beauty and skincare solutions.
Key services
Skincare product sales, Online shopping
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Facebook Pixel, Sentry, Segmenter Polyfill, Core-js polyfill
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Pixel, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Segmenter Polyfill
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information limited to phone number and physical address in structured data only.
  5. No contact forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and enforced.
  7. Facebook Pixel and Sentry used for analytics and error monitoring.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  10. Content is focused on plant-based skincare products, safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's hosting and content delivery infrastructure. It includes modern JavaScript polyfills and libraries to support browser compatibility. Facebook Pixel is integrated for marketing analytics, and Sentry is used for error tracking. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement, including LocalBusiness and WebSite schemas. Performance is moderate, with standard Wix optimizations. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. No custom frameworks beyond Wix's ecosystem were detected. The absence of security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms are notable technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small e-commerce site but can be improved in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bournebeauty.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bournebeauty.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.