Skip to main content

Security report for bounce.com

Bounce, Inc. · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bounce, Inc. operates a global luggage storage platform connecting travelers with local businesses offering secure storage spaces. With over 23,000 locations worldwide and a highly rated service, Bounce positions itself as a leading player in the travel convenience sector. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and supports multiple languages, enhancing its accessibility and user experience. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast performance and scalability. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and secure payment processing, though some security headers could be more explicitly implemented. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, Bounce demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bounce.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
87
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bounce.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
62
Employees
0
Customers
60
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
6%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for bounce.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bounce's business model is a platform-based service facilitating luggage storage bookings worldwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its extensive global network, user-friendly app, and strong customer protection policies including €10,000 coverage and free cancellation. The company targets travelers, tourists, and gig economy users needing flexible storage solutions. Revenue streams likely include booking fees and partnerships with local businesses. The presence of affiliate and partner programs indicates a broad ecosystem approach. Growth indicators include a large volume of customer reviews and multi-continent coverage. Strategic observations suggest continued expansion in emerging markets and enhancement of digital services to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

Bounce exhibits a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, secure payment integrations, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be a vector for DNS spoofing attacks. Security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly found in the HTML, which could be added to mitigate clickjacking and MIME sniffing risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and explicitly configure security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability for security and general inquiries to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bounce, Inc.
Description
Bounce offers luggage storage services with 23,000+ worldwide locations, providing a convenient app to find and book left luggage and lockers near users.
Key services
Luggage storage booking, Package pickup, Affiliate and partner programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel DNS, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Prismic CMS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, Mobile app (iOS and Android)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure payment processing via major credit cards and Apple Pay
  • No cash payments to ensure traceability and protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website offers a global luggage storage service with a strong presence in multiple countries and cities.
  2. High customer satisfaction indicated by over 1 million reviews with a 4.9 rating.
  3. Comprehensive FAQ and clear business model explanation.
  4. Multiple language support with hreflang tags for internationalization.
  5. Mobile app availability promoted prominently.
  6. Secure payment methods and clear refund/cancellation policies.
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site; contact likely via app or support pages.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, which supports server-side rendering and fast content delivery. The use of Prismic CMS allows flexible content management. Performance is optimized with image preloading, responsive design, and minimal blocking scripts. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Accessibility is addressed with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Ads for analytics and marketing. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to further optimize security headers and DNS configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bounce.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bounce.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.